The effect of soil and crop residue characteristics on polarimetric radar response
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Although the interaction between linear polarized microwaves and agricultural targets has been studied extensively, far less is understood about the added information provided from polarimetric Synthetic Aperture Radars (SARs). Using 1994 Spaceborne Imaging Radar-C (SIR-C) data, this study examines the sensitivity of linear polarizations and polarimetric parameters to conditions present on agricultural fields during the period of preplanting and postharvest. The polarimetric parameters investigated include circular polarized backscatter, pedestal height, and co-polarized phase differences (PPD). The co-polarizations signature plots are also discussed. Results indicate that the dominant scattering mechanism from these fields varies depending on the type and amount of residue cover, and whether the crop had been harvested. Radar parameters most sensitive to volume and multiple scattering perform best at characterizing these surface conditions. These parameters are the pedestal height, as well as the linear cross-polarization (HV) and the circular co-polarizations (RR). The co-polarizations signature plots and the standard deviation associated with the PPD are also useful in categorizing these cover types. However, the field average PPD provides little information on residue and soil characteristics.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".