MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Parmenion

2012· other· en· W4233627264 on OpenAlexaff
Waldemar Heckel

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Encyclopedia of Ancient History · 2012
Typeother
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicClassical Antiquity Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInfantryWifeAncient historyHistoryMacedonianEliteLawPolitical sciencePoliticsArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Parmenion, son of Philotas, was Macedon's foremost general during the reigns of Philip II of Macedon and Alexander III, The Great. Born ca. 400 bce , Parmenion was the father of the hipparch (cavalry commander) Philotas and of Nikanor, who commanded the hypaspists (shield‐bearers: the elite of the infantry). Attalos, the uncle of Philip's last wife, Cleopatra Eurydice, was Parmenion's son‐in‐law, and his liquidation at the end of 335 was Parmenion's guarantee of loyalty. In 334 he transported most of the infantry and cavalry from Sestos to Abydos, and at the beginning of the Persian campaign he commanded the infantry: twelve thousand Macedonians, seven thousand allies, and five thousand mercenaries. Parmenion's contribution to the great victories at the GRANIKOS and ISSOS are obscured by the tendency of Alexander historians to focus on the achievements of the king, who led the attack on the right; Parmenion was instructed to maintain a defensive position on the Macedonian left. At Gaugamela some hostile writers went so far as to blame the old general for Alexander's failure to capture the Great King after the latter had turned in flight. In 330 Parmenion was left in ECBATANA (HAMA‐DAN), as Alexander pushed on in pursuit of Darius; although it appears that he was to rejoin the king at a later point, Alexander decided to leave him behind, once he realized that the forthcoming campaign would require mobility and would be less dependent on heavy infantry.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.503
Threshold uncertainty score0.000

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.5030.176

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.272
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Encyclopedia of Ancient HistorySame topicClassical Antiquity StudiesFrench-language works237,207