MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4233650722 · doi:10.1353/bcc.2017.0157

Out of Wonder: Poems Celebrating Poets by Kwame Alexander

2017· article· en· W4233650722 on OpenAlex
Karen Coats

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueBulletin of the Center for Children's Books./Bulletin of the Center for Children's Books · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicPostcolonial and Cultural Literary Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPoetryWonderLiteratureArtFeelingKwameMetaphorStyle (visual arts)TributeArt historyPhilosophyTheologySociology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Out of Wonder: Poems Celebrating Poets by Kwame Alexander Karen Coats Alexander, Kwame Out of Wonder: Poems Celebrating Poets; by Kwame Alexander with Chris Colderley and Marjory Wentworth; illus. by Ekua Holmes. Candlewick, 2017 [56p] ISBN 978-0-7636-8094-7 $16.99 Reviewed from galleys R* Gr. 5-12 Taking inspiration from twenty beloved poets—nineteenth-century poets Bashō, Rumi, and Emily Dickinson as well as twentieth-century and contemporary poets from Australia, Canada, Chile, Uganda, and the U.S.—Alexander, Colderley, and Wentworth offer their own tribute poems as models for young readers and writers. The poems are divided into three sections that highlight a particular aspect of imitation and response, with brief introductions that encourage readers to similarly experiment with adopting a favorite poet’s style or taking up the same themes or feelings. Accompanying each poem is a gorgeous collage in rich colors and textures that vibrate with the overall feeling of the poem while offering a sometimes literal, sometimes metaphoric, always atmospheric rendering of its subject matter. In fact, Holmes’ use of collage offers the perfect visual metaphor for the act of transforming borrowed forms and ideas into powerful original art. The source poems are not included, but biographical notes for the referenced poets are, followed by information about their era and location. A nourishing and delicious feast for eyes and ears, this belongs on every bookshelf; with this and Nikki Grimes’ One Last Word (BCCB 12/16, this is an excellent year for poetic legacies. [End Page 298] Copyright © 2017 The Board of Trustees of the University of Illinois

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.135
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0030.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.221
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it