Studies on Alternaria Allergens
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Six extracts were prepared from Alternaria tenuis isolates ATCC 6663, ATCC 16086 and DAOM (Agriculture Canada) 183905 grown separately on two synthetic media, revised tobacco and Czapek’s, and their biochemical and immunological properties were examined. High-performance liquid chromatography revealed considerable variations in UV absorbance and carbohydrate profiles among extracts from the different isolates. These differences were less marked among samples of the same isolate cultured on different media. Enzyme screening showed that all extracts contained large amounts of phosphatases and glucosidases and moderate quantities of esterases. Only the α-galactosidase activity showed any correlation with allergenic activity. No significant variation was observed in isoelectric focusing patterns. Extensive antigenic cross-reactivity even between the different isolates was found in precipitin studies. In mouse IgE passive cutaneous anaphylaxis tests, all extracts gave reactions of similar intensity. In direct RAST and RAST inhibition assays, ATCC 16086 grown on revised tobacco medium was found to be the most potent and approached the activity of an extract from a commercial material (B-I). DAOM 183905 grown on either medium was next in potency while ATCC 6663 samples were the least potent. The results indicate that it is possible to obtain extracts of high allergenic potency for standardization purposes from growth of selected A. tenuis isolates on a chemically defined medium.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".