MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4233740825 · doi:10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjz203.812

P684 The effect of tofacitinib on serum lipids and cardiovascular safety in patients with ulcerative colitis: updated results from the tofacitinib ulcerative colitis clinical programme

2020· article· en· W4233740825 on OpenAlexaff
B E Sands, Pam R. Taub, B G Feagan, Alessandro Armuzzi, Adérson Omar Mourão Cintra Damião, Nervin Lawendy, Gastón Solano, Kenneth Kwok, John Woolcott, Leonardo Salese, Chunyan Su

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Crohn s and Colitis · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicInflammatory Bowel Disease
Canadian institutionsRobarts Clinical TrialsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTofacitinibUlcerative colitisMedicineInternal medicineGastroenterologyPlaceboAdverse effectMaceDiseaseRheumatoid arthritisMyocardial infarction

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Tofacitinib is an oral, small-molecule JAK inhibitor for the treatment of ulcerative colitis (UC). In the tofacitinib UC clinical programme, the majority of patients did not have cardiovascular (CV) risk factors at baseline (BL), and increases in lipid levels occurred primarily during induction and remained elevated to Week 61 during maintenance; lipid ratios were relatively unchanged.1 Here, we present updated results of lipid levels in the ongoing, open-label, long-term extension (OLE) study (NCT01470612) and major adverse CV events (MACE) in the Phase 3/OLE tofacitinib UC clinical programme. Methods Lipid levels were assessed at multiple time points, and changes from OLE study BL to Month 48 in the OLE study were evaluated. Lipid-lowering agent (LLA) use (proportion of patients) and adjudicated MACE (proportion of patients and incidence rate [IR; unique patients with events per 100 patient-years] with 95% confidence interval [CI]) were reported in patients with UC in two Phase 3, 8-week, placebo-controlled induction studies (OCTAVE Induction 1 and 2; NCT01465763, NCT01458951), a Phase 3, 52-week, placebo-controlled maintenance study (OCTAVE Sustain; NCT01458574) and the OLE study (data as of May 2019; database not locked). Results No major changes in total cholesterol (TC), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-c), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-c), triglycerides, LDL-c:HDL-c and TC:HDL-c from OLE study BL were observed at Month 48 of the OLE study (Table). In the Phase 3/OLE programme (n = 1124), 7.7% of patients had a new LLA added and 1.9% of patients had their LLA dose increased. Seven MACE were reported (IR 0.26; 95% CI 0.11, 0.54; 2654.66 patient-years); the IR has remained stable since Dec 2016 (IR 0.24; 95% CI 0.07, 0.62).1 Reported MACE was one each of myocardial infarction, acute myocardial infarction, acute coronary syndrome, cerebrovascular accident, haemorrhagic stroke, cerebellar haemorrhage and aortic dissection. Both myocardial infarction events and the acute coronary syndrome event led to temporary tofacitinib discontinuation; the haemorrhagic stroke, cerebrovascular accident and cerebellar haemorrhage led to permanent tofacitinib discontinuation; and the aortic dissection resulted in death. Of the seven patients with MACE, five had CV risk factors at BL. Conclusion At Month 48 of the OLE study, lipid levels and ratios remained generally unchanged from OLE study BL following tofacitinib treatment. MACE were infrequent, with the IR remaining stable since the previous report.1 Limitations include low patient numbers and short tofacitinib exposure duration. Longer-term observation studies will further assess risk. Reference

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.019

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Crohn s and ColitisSame topicInflammatory Bowel DiseaseFrench-language works237,207