Bibliographic record
Abstract
06–594Baker, Mona (U Manchester, UK; mona.baker@manchester.ac.uk ), Contextualization in translator- and interpreter-mediated events. Journal of Pragmatics (Elsevier) 38.3 (2006), 321–337. 06–595Ermida, Isabel (U Minho, Braga, Portugal; iermida@ilch.uminho.pt ), Linguistic mechanisms of power inNineteen Eighty-Four: Applying politeness theory to Orwell's world. Journal of Pragmatics (Elsevier) 38.6 (2006), 842–862. 06–596Frajzyngier, Zygmunt (U Colorado, USA; Zygmunt.Frajzyngier@colorado.edu ) & Bill Jirsa, The Principle of Indirect Means in language use and language structure. Journal of Pragmatics (Elsevier) 38.4 (2006), 513–542. 06–597Fulda, Joseph S. (New York, USA; fulda@acm.org ), Abstracts from logical form: An experimental study of the nexus between language and logic I. Journal of Pragmatics (Elsevier) 38.5 (2006), 778–807. 06–598Fulda, Joseph S. (New York, USA; fulda@acm.org ), Abstracts from logical form: An experimental study of the nexus between language and logic II. Journal of Pragmatics (Elsevier) 38.6 (2006), 925–943. 06–599House, Juliane (U Hamburg, Germany; juliane.house@uni-hamburg.de ), Text and context in translation. Journal of Pragmatics (Elsevier) 38.3 (2006), 338–358. 06–600Jiang, Xiangying (Northern Arizona U, USA; xiangying.jiang@nau.edu ), Cross-cultural pragmatic differences in US and Chinese press conferences: The case of the North Korea nuclear crisis. Discourse & Society (Sage) 17.2 (2006), 237–257. 06–601Lee, EunHee (U Buffalo, USA; ehlee@buffalo.edu ), Stative progressives in Korean and English. Journal of Pragmatics (Elsevier) 38.5 (2006), 695–717. 06–602Mason, Ian (Heriot Watt U, UK; I.Mason@hw.ac.uk ), On mutual accessibility of contextual assumptions in dialogue interpreting. Journal of Pragmatics (Elsevier) 38.3 (2006), 359–373. 06–603Pérez González, Luis (U Manchester, UK; Luis.Perez-Gonzalez@manchester.ac.uk ), Interpreting strategic recontextualization cues in the courtroom: Corpus-based insights into the pragmatic force of non-restrictive relative clauses.Journal of Pragmatics (Elsevier) 38.3 (2006), 390–417. 06–604Sannino, Annalisa (U Salerno, Fisciano, Italy; ansannin@unisa.it ), Analyzing discontinuous speech in EU conversations: a methodological proposal. Journal of Pragmatics (Elsevier) 38.4 (2006), 543–566. 06–605Setton, Robin (Fu Jen Catholic U, Taiwan; Robin.Setton@eti.unige.ch ), Context in simultaneous interpretation. Journal of Pragmatics (Elsevier) 38.3 (2006), 374–389. 06–606Taboada, Maite (Simon Fraser U, Canada; mtaboada@sfu.ca ), Discourse markers as signals (or not) of rhetorical relations. Journal of Pragmatics (Elsevier) 38.4 (2006), 567–592. 06–607Tao Lü, Jian (South China U of Technology, Guangzhou, China; antonylu@sohu.com ), Unidirectional floating of information: A case study of polylogue in a commercial colloquium. Journal of Pragmatics (Elsevier) 38.4 (2006), 475–489. 06–608Tsur, Reuven (Tel Aviv U, Israel; tsurxx@post.tau.ac.il ), Size–sound symbolism revisited. Journal of Pragmatics (Elsevier) 38.6 (2006), 905–924.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.011 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.008 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.011 | 0.013 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Research integrity | 0.005 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.145 | 0.042 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".