MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4233824353 · doi:10.1519/ssc.0b013e3181956342

Using the Transtheoretical Model to Address Androgenic-Anabolic Steroid Use in Adolescents and Young Adults: Part Two

2009· article· en· W4233824353 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueStrength and conditioning journal · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHormonal and reproductive studies
Canadian institutionsCentre for Movement Disorders
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTranstheoretical modelMainstreamSteroid useAnabolic-Androgenic SteroidsMedicinePsychologyAsideAnabolismEndocrinologySocial psychologyInternal medicineBehavior changePolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ANDROGENIC-ANABOLIC STEROIDS (AAS), AND SIMILAR “BODY IMAGE” DRUGS, CONTINUE TO RECEIVE POPULAR MEDIA COVERAGE. ASIDE FROM SPORT, THE USE OF AAS IN MAINSTREAM SOCIETY HAS BECOME POPULAR FOR AESTHETIC PURPOSES, PARTICULARLY AMONG ADOLESCENTS AND YOUNG ADULTS. THIS ARTICLE WILL PROVIDE THE PRACTICING STRENGTH AND CONDITIONING AND HEALTH PROFESSIONAL WITH INSIGHT AND EFFECTIVE STRATEGIES FOR ADDRESSING AAS AND OTHER PERFORMANCE-ENHANCING DRUG USE IN ADOLESCENTS AND YOUNG ADULTS. THE TRANSTHEORETICAL MODEL IS USED AS A FRAMEWORK FOR DEVISING SPECIFIC STRATEGIES TO ADDRESS THIS GROWING PUBLIC HEALTH ISSUE.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.139
Threshold uncertainty score0.308

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.302
Teacher spread0.272 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it