MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4234048494 · doi:10.1513/pats.200907-063al

Cryptococcus

2010· review· en· W4234048494 on OpenAlexaff
Shu Shun Li, Christopher H. Mody

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the American Thoracic Society · 2010
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicFungal Infections and Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cryptococcus is a unique environmental fungus. Among the more than three dozen species of Cryptococcus, only C. neoformans and C. gattii commonly cause disease. Although many of these infections occur in immunocompromised patients, C. gattii has recently come to public attention because of an outbreak of devastating illness in immunocompetent individuals. The polysaccharide capsule of Cryptococcus is a major virulence factor, and in addition to surrounding the organism, it is also released into the environment. Cryptococcus is believed to enter the body through the lung causing pulmonary disease, but because of its neurotropic nature, the central nervous system is a major target organ. The major risk factors include HIV and organ transplantation. Depending on the site of infection and the patient's immune status, the clinical manifestations vary from asymptomatic to severe life-threatening disease. Treatment regimens depend on the immune status of the patient and the severity of the disease, and include both polyene and imidazole antifungal agents in addition to surgical adjuvant therapy. However, despite antifungal therapy, the mortality remains between 10 and 25% in patients with AIDS, and at least one-third of patients with cryptococcal meningitis experience mycological or clinical failure. Consequently, the mechanism of cryptococcal invasion, immune response, pathogenesis, and treatment continue to be areas of active study. With our advancing knowledge in these areas, we aim at better management for this devastating group of infections.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.974
Threshold uncertainty score0.804

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.057
GPT teacher head0.402
Teacher spread0.344 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations117
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of the American Thoracic SocietySame topicFungal Infections and StudiesFrench-language works237,207