Maternal and Infant Outcomes after Injury during Pregnancy in Washington State from 1989 to 1997
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background Few population-based studies have assessed maternal and infant outcomes after nonfatal injuries occurring during pregnancy. Methods We performed a retrospective cohort study to assess outcomes of pregnant women hospitalized for injury in Washington State from 1989 to 1997. We used the Injury Severity Score (ISS) to classify 266 nonseverely injured (ISS of 1–8) and 28 severely injured (ISS > 9) pregnant women who delivered at their injury hospitalization. We compared these women to 12,578 pregnant women randomly selected from Washington State birth and fetal death certificates who had no injury hospitalization during pregnancy. Results Nonseverely injured pregnant women were at increased risk of placental abruption and their infants were at increased risk of hypoxia and fetal death. Severely injured pregnant women were at a 17-fold (95% confidence interval, 6.2–46.8) increased risk of placental abruption and their infants were at increased risk of prematurity, low birth weight, and fetal distress, and a 30-fold (95% confidence interval, 9.4–97.1) increased risk of fetal death. Conclusion Nonsevere as well as severe injuries resulting in hospitalization during pregnancy can result in adverse maternal and infant outcomes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it