MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4234053365 · doi:10.31274/ahac.8349

Attitude Sensing and Control of a Stratosphere Balloon Platform

2012· report· en· W4234053365 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typereport
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAerospace Engineering and Energy Systems
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAttitude controlPayload (computing)PID controllerStratosphereAerospace engineeringInertial measurement unitKalman filterTelescopeComputer scienceEngineeringRemote sensingControl theory (sociology)SimulationControl (management)Control engineeringPhysicsMeteorologyTemperature controlGeologyOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The objective of this project is to design and construct an attitude control platform that is suitable for high altitude stratospheric flight using a helium-filled latex balloon. An intended payload will be a microwave source that calibrates a ground based telescope by rotating the platform to the appropriate attitude. The design choices presented involve the use of an inertial measurement unit to determine the attitude and reaction wheels to rotate the platform. A Kalman filter will be used to smooth out the attitude readings and a PID controller will be used to control the platform.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.928
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.211
Teacher spread0.190 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAerospace Engineering and Energy SystemsFrench-language works237,207