MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4234062227 · doi:10.1139/apnm-2021-0172

Canadian Nutrition Society: 2021 Scientific Abstracts: Canadian Nutrition Society Annual Conference

2021· article· en· W4234062227 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Mavra Ahmed, Madyson Weippert, Nour Nayed, Christine Mulligan, Laura Vergeer, Beatriz Franco‐Arellano, Chantal Julia, M. C. L., Khaled Ali Alawaini, Janet A. Taylor, Robert Anderson, Janet A. Brunton, Robert F. Bertolo, Tressa Alexiuk, Bhanu Pilli, Aynslie Hinds, Joyce Slater, Janani Balakrishnan, Annick Vachon, Pauline Léveillé, Anita Houeto, Raphaël Chouinard‐Watkins, Dominique Lorain, Mélanie Plourde, Megan R. Beggs, Kennedi Young, Wanling Pan, Debbie O’Neill, Matthew Saurette, Emmanuelle Cordat, Henrik Dimke, Robert F. Todd, Didier Brassard, Lisa‐Anne Elvidge, Sylvie St‐Pierre, Simone Lemieux, Patricia M. Guenther, Hassan Vatanparast, Mahsa Jessri, Jennifer E. Vena, Alejandro Gonzalez, Dana Lee Olstad, Haines Jess, Sharon I. Kirkpatrick, Benoı̂t Lamarche, Katrina Cachero, Rebecca C. Mollard, Semone B. Myrie, Dylan MacKay, Kelsey M Cochrane, Rajavel Elango, Angela M. Devlin, Jennifer A. Hutcheon, Crystal D Karakochuk

Bibliographic record

VenueApplied Physiology Nutrition and Metabolism · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicNutrition, Genetics, and Disease
Canadian institutionsUniversity of GuelphUniversity of CalgaryAlberta Health ServicesUniversity of WaterlooMemorial University of NewfoundlandToronto Metropolitan UniversityUniversité de SherbrookeUniversity of TorontoHealth CanadaUniversity of ManitobaUniversity of SaskatchewanUniversity of AlbertaUniversité LavalUniversity of British ColumbiaCentre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-Justine
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical scienceLibrary scienceEngineering ethicsComputer scienceEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An unhealthy diet is a critical modifiable risk factor for chronic diseases.The Diabetes Canada Clinical Practice (DCCP) Guidelines encourage healthy eating by recommending consumption of certain foods or nutrients (e.g., fruits and vegetables, fibre), while limiting the intake of others (e.g., high salt/sugar foods).However, many consumers find it challenging to interpret these recommendations.Nutrient profiling (NP) models are interpretative tools that set nutrient thresholds aligned with dietary guidelines, which can be used to guide consumers towards healthier food choices.To develop a NP model based on the healthy eating recommendations in the DCCP guidelines.A systematic methodology to assess foods in alignment with DCCP guidelines was developed, using the University of Toronto Food Label Information Program database 2017 (n=17,360 packaged foods and beverages).The DCCP-NP model categorizes individual food and beverage items into two categories (i.e., 'in alignment' and 'not in alignment') with the guidelines, based on specific nutrient thresholds (i.e., high-sodium, high-fat, highsugar) or recommended food groups (e.g., whole grains).Products were categorized according to Health Canada's Table of Reference Amounts.The DCCP-NP model requires a 'pass' on all four steps to be considered 'in alignment' with this model: 1) exclude processed product (i.e., choosing whole and less refined foods); 2) lean animal protein (≤10% of total fat) and more vegetable protein; 3) low glycemic-index foods; and 4) foods without excessive saturated fats (≤9% daily value).Overall, 10% of packaged foods were 'in alignment' the DCCP-NP.Specifically, 77% of nuts/seeds, 46% of legumes, 31% of cereals, 23% of vegetables 17% of fruits, 13% of eggs, 12% of beverages, 11% of marine, 3% of dairy, 3% of potatoes, 2% of salads and 1% of processed meat were 'in alignment' with the DCCP-NP.This study developed the first NP model specific for an at-risk population.This indicates that very few packaged foods and beverages meet the standards in the DCCP guidelines, suggesting an overall low nutritional quality of the packaged food supply.People with diabetes can choose very few packaged foods and still follow the DCCP guidelines.(Sanofi Pasteur

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.443
Threshold uncertainty score0.870

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0040.005
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0070.002
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0040.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.4430.242

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.219
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2021
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueApplied Physiology Nutrition and MetabolismSame topicNutrition, Genetics, and DiseaseFrench-language works237,207