Bibliographic record
Abstract
Books reviewed: Paul A. Cimbala and Randall M. Miller (eds.), An Uncommon Time: The Civil War and the Northern Home Front David Goldfield, Still Fighting the Civil War: The American South and Southern History James McPherson, Antietam: The Battle that Changed the Course of the Civil War Mark Meister and Phyllis M. Japp (eds.), Enviropop: Studies in Environmental Rhetoric and Popular Culture Avrom Fleishman, New Class Culture: How an Emergent Class Is Transforming America's Culture Richard E. Bales, The Great Chicago Fire and the Myth of Mrs. O’Leary's Cow W. H. New (ed.), Encyclopedia of Literature In Canada Archie Green, Tin Men David M. Wrobel, Promised Lands: Promotion, Memory, and the Creation of the American West William H. Young and Nancy K. Young, American Popular Culture Through History: The 1930s Donald E. Pease and Robyn Wiegman (eds.), The Futures of American Studies W. J. Rorabaugh, Kennedy and The Promise of the Sixties Robert Cohen (ed.), Dear Mrs. Roosevelt: The Letters From Children of the Great Depression Sally G. McMillen, To Raise Up the South: Sunday Schools in Black and White Churches, 1865‐1915 James A. Von Schilling, The Magic Window: American Television, 1939‐1953 Albert Borowitz, Blood & Ink: An International Guide To Fact‐Based Crime Literature DeAnne Blanton and Lauren M. Cook, They Fought Like Demons: Women Soldiers in the American Civil War
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".