Book reviews
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Sport, Popular Culture and Identity. Roche, M. (ed.) (1998). Aachen: Meyer & Meyer. 224 pages. The Economics of Professional Team Sports. Downward, P. and Dawson, A. (2000), London and New York: Routledge. 247 pages. Economics of Sport and Recreation. Gratton, C., and Taylor, P. (2000). London: E & FN Spon. 234 pages. Taking Sport Seriously. Allison, L. (ed.) (1998). Chelsea School Research Centre Edition, vol 6. Aachen: Meyer & Meyer Sport. 204 pages. The Changing Face of the Football Business. Hamil, S., Michie, J., Oughton, C., and Warby, S (eds.). (2000). London: Frank Cass. 121 pages. Sport Tourism. Standeven, J., and DeKnop, P. (1998). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics. 376 pages. Economie du sport, collection. Bourg, J.F. and Gouguet, J.J. (2001). “Repères” n° 309, Editions La Découverte, Paris. 128 pages. Organisation et pratique du sport en milieu scolaire. Touchard, Y. (2000). Voiron, Presses Universitaires du Sport. 250 pages. Shaping the Superman: Fascist Body as Political Icon‐Aryan Fascism. Mangan, J. (ed.) (1999). London: Cass. 204 pages.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.019 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".