Reviews
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Entre aventures, syllogismes et confessions. Belgique, Roumanie, Suisse , Marc Quaghebeur & Laurent Rossin, (dir.), (2004) Bruxelles: Peter Lang, 377 pp., ISBN 90-5201-209-4 (pbk), 32.50, 23, US $38.95 Reframing Difference: Beur and Banlieue Filmmaking in France , Carrie Tarr, (2005) Manchester: Manchester University Press, 230 pp., ISBN 0719068770, 14.99 Discours et constructions identitaires , Denise Deshaies and Diane Vincent (eds), (2004) Qubec: Les Presses de l'Universit Laval, 228 pp., ISBN 2763781896 (pbk), CAN$25 Travel in Twentieth-Century French and Francophone Cultures: The Persistence of Diversity , Charles Forsdick, (2005) Oxford: Oxford University Press, 255 pp., ISBN 0199258295 (hbk), $95.00 France and Indochina: Cultural Representations , Kathryn Robson and Jennifer Yee (eds), (2005) Lanham, MD: Lexington Books, 237 pp., ISBN 0739108409 (pbk), 17.99 Les Juifs de la Rpublique en Algrie et au Maroc: Mmoires d'autres temps , Roger Bensadoun, (2003) Paris: Publisud, 185 pp., ISBN 2866009509 (pbk), 22.60 The Collected Works of Langston Hughes, Volume 16: The Translations: Federico Garca Lorca, Nicols Guilln, and Jacques Roumain , Langston Hughes (edited by Dellita Martin-Ogunsola), (2003) Columbia: University of Missouri Press, xvii 267 pp., ISBN 0826214355 (hbk), $34.95
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".