MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Comparative distribution of pituitary adenylate cyclase‐activating polypeptide (PACAP) binding sites and PACAP receptor mRNAs in the rat brain during development

2000· article· en· W4234198286 on OpenAlexaff
Magali Basille, David Vaudry, Yolaine Coulouarn, Sylvie Jégou, Isabelle Lihrmann, Alain Fournier, Hubert Vaudry, Bruno J. Gonzalez

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Comparative Neurology · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeuropeptides and Animal Physiology
Canadian institutionsInstitut National de la Recherche Scientifique
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiologyVasoactive intestinal peptideCerebellumReceptorIn situ hybridizationAdenylate kinaseNeuropeptidePituitary adenylate cyclase-activating peptideInternal medicineEndocrinologyMessenger RNAMolecular biologyBinding siteCell biologyBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The distribution and density of pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating polypeptide (PACAP) binding sites as well as PACAP-specific receptor 1 (PAC1-R), vasoactive intestinal polypeptide/PACAP receptor 1 (VPAC1-R), and VPAC2-R mRNAs have been investigated in the rat brain from embryonic day 14 (E14) to postnatal day 8 (P8). Significant numbers of binding sites for the radioiodinated, 27-amino-acid form of PACAP were detected as early as E14 in the neuroepithelia of the metencephalon and the myelencephalon. From E14 to E21, the density of binding sites in the germinative areas increased by 3- to 5-fold. From birth to P12, the density of binding sites gradually declined in all neuroepithelia except in the external granule cell layer of the cerebellum, where the level of binding sites remained high during the first postnatal weeks. Only low to moderate densities of PACAP binding sites were found in regions other than the germinative areas, with the exception of the internal granule cell layer of the cerebellum, which contained a high density of sites. The localization of PACAP receptor mRNAs was investigated by in situ hybridization using [35S] uridine triphosphate-specific riboprobes. The evolution of the distribution of PAC1-R and VPAC1-R mRNAs was very similar to that of PACAP binding sites, the concentration of VPAC1-R mRNA being much lower than that of PAC1-R mRNA. In contrast, intense expression of VPAC2-R mRNA was observed in brain regions other than germinative areas, such as the suprachiasmatic, ventral thalamic, and dorsolateral geniculate nuclei. The discrete localization of PACAP binding sites as well as PAC1-R and VPAC1-R mRNAs in neuroepithelia during embryonic life and postnatal development strongly suggests that PACAP, acting through PAC1-R and/or VPAC1-R, may play a crucial role in the regulation of neurogenesis in the rat brain. J. Comp. Neurol. 425:495–509, 2000. © 2000 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.291
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Comparative NeurologySame topicNeuropeptides and Animal PhysiologyFrench-language works237,207