Levels of compatibility in a new host-parasite association: <i>Apis mellifera/Varroa jacobsoni</i>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We investigated the relationships between the honey bee, Apis mellifera, and the parasitic mite Varroa jacobsoni in Mexico. In an 18-month survey of European honey bees (EHB) and Africanized honey bees (AHB), we showed that EHB were highly compatible with V. jacobsoni, while AHB were not as compatible. Furthermore, mite infertility ("parasite infectivity" factor), suspected to be the main factor of low AHB/V. jacobsoni compatibility in Brazil, was not observed in Mexico. The "intrinsic rate of natural increase" of mites did not differ significantly between host subspecies, indicating that the cause of low compatibility appears only at high parasite densities. The "carrying capacity" was twice as high in EHB as in AHB, indicating that the cause of low compatibility is possibly linked to honey bees' behavior. We hypothesize that the reason why V. jacobsoni is highly fertile on Mexican AHB (whereas it has low fertility on Brazilian AHB) may be that different strains of V. jacobsoni exist in the two countries.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".