Microsculpture and phylogenetic significance of the spermatheca of black flies (Diptera: Simuliidae)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The highly varied spermatheca of black flies provided an under-studied character system for phylogenetic reconstruction of the Simuliidae. Scanning electron microscopy of the spermatheca of 17 simuliid species elucidated folds and spicules on the inner surface; callosities, anastomosing ridges, and minute tubercles on the outer surface; and an intricately fluted spermathecal duct. The spermatheca of Parasimulium crosskeyi, the most plesiomorphic taxon, had a slightly wrinkled inner surface and an outer surface with acutely raised polygonal ridges. Species hypothesized to be among the basal lineages of the simuliids (e.g., Helodon susanae and Prosimulium magnum) had an irregularly folded inner spermathecal surface, but their relationships were not well resolved on the basis of information about the spermatheca. More evolutionarily derived species, including a number of species in the genus Simulium, had short or filiform spicules on the inner surface of the spermatheca. Although the use of a single character system, the spermatheca, did not fully resolve relationships among Simuliidae, its utility as a rich source of phylogenetic information was demonstrated.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".