MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Hamburg, 1350–1815

2020· reference-entry· en· W4234541004 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Frank Hatje

Bibliographic record

VenueRenaissance and Reformation · 2020
Typereference-entry
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicMedieval History and Crusades
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEconomyEconomic historyBoroughGeographyColonialismPopulationProtectoratePoliticsPort (circuit theory)PeninsulaPolitical scienceHistoryEconomicsArchaeologyLawDemographySociology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Originally, Hamburg was a borough around the cathedral of the archbishops of Hamburg-Bremen and a mercantile port city founded by the counts of Holsatia. In the 13th century both towns were united, given privileges supporting port and trade, and granted an ample political autonomy. As a member of the Hanseatic League, the city grew economically and demographically, particularly when Dutch and Sephardic refugees transferred their capital, know-how, and commercial networks after the fall of Antwerp in 1585. By that time, Hamburg’s merchants had already begun to link the markets around the Baltic and North Seas with the Iberian Peninsula and the Mediterranean. The extraordinary upturn around 1600 is evidenced by a rapid population growth and the huge sums that were spent on public buildings, which reflected Dutch influence, like the fortification and a number of welfare institutions as well as the stock exchange and the bank which turned Hamburg into an international hub of finance and trade ranking next to Amsterdam and London. During the 18th century her port became one of the most important emporia for French colonial goods until the 1790s, when the effects of the revolutionary wars made it crucial for British (re-)exportation to central Europe. The economic development was supported by Hamburg’s extraordinary constitutional setting. In 1618, the city’s status as a Free Imperial City was confirmed, whereas the kings of Denmark relinquished their claims on the city not until 1768, which resulted in strict neutrality policies of an independently acting city state whose rather exceptional republican constitution had been agreed upon by magistrate and citizens’ assembly in 1529, together with adopting the Reformation. Hamburg’s “state church” became a stronghold of orthodox Lutheranism. Since late 17th century, religious pluralism spread and Hamburg became one of the centers of the Enlightenment in the German-speaking lands, not least fostered by its republican political and civic culture. While the French revolution was hailed among the city’s elites, the effects of the French occupation in 1806 and the integration into the Napoleonic Empire in 1811 cooled down any enthusiasm. Although this nourished a considerable current of national patriotism, politics as well as civic identity resulted from the patriotic self-consciousness of a sovereign, independent city state trading with the rest of the world.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.095
Threshold uncertainty score0.317

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0950.042

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.046
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.189 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRenaissance and ReformationSame topicMedieval History and CrusadesFrench-language works237,207