Bibliographic record
Abstract
Citation (2016), "Editorial Advisory Board", The Structuring of Work in Organizations (Research in the Sociology of Organizations, Vol. 47), Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Bingley, pp. xi-xii. https://doi.org/10.1108/S0733-558X20160000047008 Publisher: Emerald Group Publishing Limited Copyright © 2016 Emerald Group Publishing Limited SERIES EDITOR Michael Lounsbury Canada Research Chair in Entrepreneurship & Innovation Alberta School of Business, Alberta, Canada ADVISORY BOARD MEMBERS Howard E. Aldrich University of North Carolina, USA Christine Beckman University of Maryland, USA Jeannette Colyvas Northwestern University, USA Barbara Czarniawska Göteborg University, Sweden Gerald F. Davis University of Michigan, USA Marie-Laure Djelic ESSEC Business School, France Frank R. Dobbin Harvard University, USA Royston Greenwood University of Alberta, Canada Mauro Guillen The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, USA Paul M. Hirsch Northwestern University, USA Candace Jones University of Edinburgh, United Kingdom Brayden King Northwestern University, USA Ann Langley HEC Montreal, Canada Renate Meyer Vienna University of Economics and Business Administration, Austria Mark Mizruchi University of Michigan, USA Nelson Phillips Imperial College London, United Kingdom Walter W. Powell Stanford University, USA Marc Schneiberg Reed College, USA W. Richard Scott Stanford University, USA Sarah Soule Stanford University, USA Haridimos Tsoukas Alba, Greece Eero Vaara Aalto, Finland Book Chapters The Structuring of Work in Organizations Research in the Sociology of Organizations The Structuring of Work in Organizations Copyright Page List of Contributors Editorial Advisory Board Introduction: Bringing Jobs Back In: Toward a New Multi-Level Approach to the Study of Work and Organizations Part I: Tasks and Jobs as Building Blocks Jobs as Gordian Knots: A New Perspective Linking Individuals, Tasks, Organizations, and Institutions Idiosyncratic Jobs, Organizational Transformation, and Career Mobility The Ideology of Silence at the Harvard Business School: Structuring Faculty’s Teaching Tasks for Moral Relativism Part II: Occupational and Professional Boundaries What Do Technicians Mean When They Talk about Professionalism? An Ethnography of Speaking Compliance Police or Business Partner? Institutional Complexity and Occupational Tensions in Human Resource Management Part III: Structure as Constraint Structure at Work: Organizational Forms and the Division of Labor in U.S. Wineries It’s Not You, It’s Your Job: Network Evolution within Firms Help Me Do It on My Own: How Entrepreneurs Manage Autonomy and Constraint within Incubator Organizations Part IV: Changing and Perpetuating Structures Legal Avoidance and the Restructuring of Work Externalization of Work by Corporate Law Firms: Implications for Careers and the Profession Work as Commons: Internal Labor Markets, Blended Workforces and Management From Adapting Practices to Inhabiting Ideas: How Managers Restructure Work across Organizations
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.028 | 0.007 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".