Bibliographic record
Abstract
From the Editors James H. Cox and Daniel Heath Justice This issue of SAIL contains articles on several of the field's most celebrated authors and a review of the work of one of their more neglected contemporaries. Alex Hollenberg offers a Canadian's understanding of the intellectual challenges of "separatism" in Craig Womack's work, one informed by the ever-present rhetoric of Quebec separatism in Canada. J. James Iovannone examines transgendered performances in Louise Erdrich's The Master Butchers Singing Club, Four Souls, and The Last Report on the Miracles at Little No Horse. Iovannone's article is a provocative contribution to and intervention in the critical conversation about how Erdrich theorizes gender in her novels. Stephanie Li investigates the politics of gardening, along with mothering and storytelling, as domestic resistance to colonialism in Leslie Marmon Silko's Gardens in the Dunes, while Arnold Krupat's introduction to Ralph Salisbury's new book, Light from a Bullet Hole: New and Selected Poems, 1950–2008, honors the healing poems of a "Cherokee humanist and Indigenous cosmopolitan." This review reminds us, too, of our responsibility to listen with vigilance to all the Indigenous voices that have spoken and are now speaking. We hope that between the moment we write these words and the moment you read them that we have visited with each other at the Native American Literature Symposium in Albuquerque or, perhaps, at another conference, symposium, or kitchen table. [End Page vii] Copyright © 2009 University of Nebraska Press
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.020 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.012 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.006 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.415 | 0.394 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".