MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4234683730 · doi:10.1093/yiel/yvu004

2. Coastal Zone Management

2013· article· en· W4234683730 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Daniel O. Suman, Manoj Shivlani

Bibliographic record

VenueYearbook of International Environmental Law · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicCoastal and Marine Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsConvention on Biological DiversityEnvironmental resource managementBiodiversityGeographyClimate changeMarine protected areaEcosystem servicesEnvironmental planningCoastal managementEcosystemPopulationBusinessEcologyEnvironmental science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Subsidiary Body on Scientific, Technical and Technological Advice (SBSTTA) for the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) held its seventeenth meeting (SBSTTA-17) in Montreal, Canada, on 14–18 October. Recommendation XVII/1 of SBSTTA-17 discussed the scientific and technical needs related to the implementation of the Aichi Biodiversity Targets of the Strategic Plan for Biodiversity 2011–20. Needs focus on more reliable, accessible, and affordable data; better integration of the social sciences and more effective communication; the improvement of methodologies to assess status and trends of species and ecosystems; the improvement of planning tools; better integration of science and policy; the wiser use of economic instruments; better inclusion of indigenous and traditional knowledge bases; and the maintenance, conservation, and restoration of ecosystems. Referring to Target 6 (sustainable harvest and management of fish stocks by 2020), Recommendation XVII/1 notes that a major challenge is the application of the term ‘safe ecological limits’ at population and ecosystem levels. Monitoring should focus on inland, coastal, and pelagic fisheries. Target 10 (minimization of anthropogenic impacts of coral reefs and other ecosystems impacted by climate change by 2015) centres on the identification of vulnerable ecosystems at national and regional levels using the consistent assessments of relative vulnerability to climate change. The SBSTTA recommendation also identifies needs for Target 11 (10 percent of coastal and marine areas should be conserved through systems of protected areas by 2020). Marine spatial planning tools can help meet this goal, and research must focus on the impacts of climate change on marine and coastal protected areas. Recommendations relevant to coastal areas also focus on Target 15 (restoration of at least 15 percent of degraded ecosystems to enhance carbon stocks thus contributing to climate change mitigation and adaptation). The SBSTTA notes that capacity and knowledge about the restoration of coastal and marine ecosystems is limited and encourages further development of pilot projects. Additionally, improvement of remote sensing tools for measuring carbon in aquatic ecosystems (blue carbon) is necessary.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.879
Threshold uncertainty score0.996

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0370.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.164
Teacher spread0.162 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueYearbook of International Environmental LawSame topicCoastal and Marine ManagementFrench-language works237,207