MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Richard III

2019· reference-entry· en· W4234702111 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Stella Fletcher

Bibliographic record

VenueRenaissance and Reformation · 2019
Typereference-entry
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicMedieval Literature and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBuckinghamThroneBrotherRumorArchbishopOpposition (politics)HistoryClassicsGenealogyLawArt historyPolitics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The youngest son of Richard, duke of York (b. 1411–b. 1460) and his duchess, Cecily Neville (b. 1415–1495), was born on 2 October 1452, and named after his father: see Reference Works. York’s dynastic claim to the throne of England can be traced in Overviews and was made good by another son, who became King Edward IV in 1461, with Richard being made duke of Gloucester later that year. The duke married his maternal kinswoman Anne Neville (b. 1456–d. 1485), who gave birth to his only legitimate child, Edward of Middleham, at an unknown date. He distinguished himself as a soldier, principally in the Scottish campaign of 1482. Edward IV’s death on 9 April 1483 left the twelve-year-old Edward V as king and power in the hands of his maternal Woodville kinsmen. With the support of his brother-in-law Henry Stafford, duke of Buckingham, Gloucester engineered a coup, destroying the Woodville interest. In late June popular support was gained for the argument that neither Edward V nor his brother Richard, duke of York, were of legitimate birth, and that Gloucester, the only adult male of the ruling house, should assume the throne. He was crowned on 6 July. The fate of the two boys remained unknown while opposition to Richard III’s usurpation mounted, though the duke of Buckingham’s rebellion was quashed. The Contemporary Sources are frustratingly patchy, with rumor and speculation filling the gaps. Richard’s opponents regrouped around the little-known exile Henry Tudor (see the Oxford Bibliographies in Renaissance and Reformation article “Henry VII”), whose invasion in 1485 resulted in Richard’s defeat and death at Bosworth Field on 22 August. The king’s Disputed Reputation saw him cast as a consummate villain in the 15th and 16th Centuries, with a dramatic reassessment following in the 17th–20th Centuries. There are numerous Modern Biographies of Richard and his family, but relatively few that need be employed for academic purposes. As with Overviews, the Journals section of this article features the work of the Richard III Society, while Collections of Papers are the preserve of academic historians. Domestic politics appears here as The King and His Subjects, Religion and Culture is self-explanatory, and Popes and Princes deals with international relations. The popularity and versatility of Shakespeare’s play means that a further section is devoted to Richard III in Popular Culture, and the posthumous history would have ended there had the king’s bones not been discovered in 2012 and reburied “with dignity and honour” three years later, so that archaeological discoveries are brought together from both Bosworth and Leicester.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.257
Threshold uncertainty score0.860

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0040.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.2570.165

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRenaissance and ReformationSame topicMedieval Literature and HistoryFrench-language works237,207