Esophageal Candidiasis in a Patient With Uncontrolled Diabetes Mellitus and Recurrent Abdominal Pain, Symptomatic Or Incidental? A Case Report and Brief Literature Review
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Esophageal candidiasis (EC) is a common opportunistic infection in patients with impaired cellular immunity, such as human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection. However, it can also be found in individuals with certain predisposing conditions like uncontrolled diabetes mellitus (DM) and the use of certain medications. We report a 54-year-old female with past medical history of DM, hypertension and hyperlipidemia who presented to the ER with worsening periumbilical and epigastric pain for 2 days. She had multiple similar presentations requiring admissions to different hospitals and had undergone extensive workup over the past year. She only had transient improvement from these hospitalizations. Esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) performed on day 2 of admission revealed extensive creamy pseudomembranous exudate through the entire length of esophagus confirmed as Candida albicans by brush scraping analysis. She received oral fluconazole with significant relief of her symptoms over the next couple of weeks. Although EC remains asymptomatic in the majority of patients and is only detected incidentally on EGD, its diagnosis and treatment can provide significant symptomatic relief in many patients. EC should be considered as a potential diagnosis in the appropriate clinical setting even in patients with no evidence of overt immunodeficiency. J Med Cases. 2015;6(11):523-526 doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.14740/jmc2337w
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".