Bibliographic record
Abstract
05–32Allen, Linda Quinn (Iowa State U, USA). Implementing a culture portfolio project within a constructivist paradigm. Foreign Language Annals (New York, USA) 37.2 (2004), 232–239. 05–33Al-Sehayer, Khalid (Riyadh, Saudi Arabia). ESL readers' perceptions of reading in well structured and less structured hypertext environment. CALICO Journal (TX, USA) 22.2 (2005), 191–212. 05–34Barcroft, Joe (Washington U, USA). Second language vocabulary acquisition: a lexical input processing approach. Foreign Language Annals (New York, USA) 37.2 (2004), 200–208. 05–35Bateman, Blair E. (Brigham Young U, USA). Achieving affective and behavioural outcomes in culture learning: the case for ethnographic interviews. Foreign Language Annals (New York, USA) 37.2 (2004), 240–253. 05–36Chen, Tsai Yu & Chang, Goretti B. Y. (Ming Hsin U of Science and Technology, Taiwan). The relationship between foreign language anxiety and learning difficulties. Foreign Language Annals (New York, USA) 37.2 (2004), 279–289. 05–37Csizér, Kata (Eötvös U, Hungary; weinkata@yahoo.com ) & Dömyei, Zoltán (Nottingham U, UK; Zoltan.Dornyei@nottingham.ac.uk ). The internal structure of language learning motivation and its relationship with language choice and learning effort. The Modern Language Journal (Madison, Wl, USA) 89.1 (2005), 19–36. 05–38DeCapua, Andrea (Dept. of Teaching and Learning, New York, USA; adecapua@optonline.net ) & Wintergerst, Ann. C. Assessing and validating a learning styles instrument. System (Oxford, UK) 33.1 (2005), 1–16. 05–39De Florio-Hansen, Inez (U of Kassel, Germany). Wortschatzerwerb und Wortschatzlernen von Fremdsprachenstudierenden. Erste Ergebnisse einer empirischen Untersuchung [Acquisition and learning of vocabulary by university students of modern foreign languages: the first results from an empirical investigation]. Fremdsprachen Lehren und Lernen (Tübingen, Germany) 33 (2004), 83–113. 05–40Derwing, Tracey M. (U of Alberta, Canada; tracey.derwing@ualberta.ca ), Rossiter, Marian J., Munro, Murray J. & Thomson, Ron I. Second language fluency: judgments on different tasks. Language Learning (Oxford, UK) 54.4 (2004), 655–679. 05–41Donato, Richard & Brooks, B. Frank (U of Pittsburgh, USA). Literary discussions and advanced speaking fucntions: researching the (dis) connection. Foreign Language Annals (New York, USA) 37.3 (2004), 183–199. 05–42Ecke, Peter (U of Arizona, USA). Die Schlüsselwort-Mnemonik für den fremdsprachigen Wortschatzerwerb: Zum Stand der Forschung [The mnemonic keyword method and the acquisition of foreign language vocabulary: state of the art research]. Fremdsprachen Lehren und Lernen (Tübingen, Germany) 33 (2004), 213–230. 05–43Erlam, Rosemary (U of Auckland, NZ; r.erlam@auckland.ac.nz ). Language aptitude and its relationship to instructional effectiveness in second language acquisition. Language Teaching Research (London, UK) 9.2 (2005), 147–171. 05–44Félix-Brasdefer, J. César (Indiana U, USA; cfelixbr.@indiana.edu ). Interlanguage refusals: linguistic politeness and length of residence in the target community. Language Learning (Oxford, UK) 54.4 (2004), 587–653. 05–45Fonder-Solano, Leah & Burnett, Joanne (Pennsylvania State U, USA). Teaching literature/reading: a dialogue on professional growth. Foreign Language Annals (New York, USA) 37.3 (2004), 459–469. 05–46Guion, Susan G., Harada, Tetsuo & Clark, J. J. (U of Oregon, USA; guion@uoregon.edu ). Early and late Spanish-English bilinguals' acquisition of English word stress patterns. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition (Cambridge, UK) 7.3 (2004), 207–226. 05–47Hardison, Debra M. (Michigan State U, USA). Contextualised computer-based L2 prosody training: evaluating the effects of discourse context and video input. CALICO Journal (TX, USA) 22. 2 (2005), 175–190. 05–48Jones, Randall (Brigham Young U, USA). Corpus-based word frequency analysis and the teaching of German vocabulary. Fremdsprachen Lehren und Lernen (Tübingen, Germany) 33 (2004), 165–175. 05–49Jung, Euen Hyuk (Sarah) (Yonsei U, South Korea; junge@yonsei.ac.kr ). Topic and subject prominence in interlanguage development. Language Learning (Oxford, UK) 54.4(2004), 713–738. 05–50Lamb, Martin (U of Leeds, UK; m.v.lamb@education.leeds.ac.uk ). ‘It depends on the students themselves’: independent language learning at an Indonesian state school. Language, Culture and Curriculum (Clevedon, UK) 17.3 (2004), 229–245. 05–51Li, Xuemei & Girvan, Anita (Queen's U, Canada). The “Third Place”: investigating an ESL classroom interculture. TESL Canada Journal (Burnaby, Canada) 22.1 (2004), 1–15. 05–52Li, Via (U of Alberta, Canada). Learning to live and study in Canada: stories of four EFL learners from China. TESL Canada Journal (Burnaby, Canada) 22.1 (2004), 25–43. 05–53Mason, Beniko & Krashen, Stephen (Shitennoji International Buddhist U, Japan; benikonankimason@hotmail.com ). Is form-focused vocabulary instruction worthwhile?RELC Journal (Singapore) 35.2 (2004), 179–185. 05–54Nakatani, Yasuo (Nakamura Gakuen Junior College, Japan; nakatani@nakamura-u.ac.jp ). The effects of awareness-raising training on oral communication strategy use. The Modern Language Journal (Madison, Wl, USA) 89.1 (2005), 76–91. 05–55Nitta, R. & Gardner, S. (U of Warwick, UK). Consciousness-raising and practice in ELT course books. ELT Journal (Oxford, UK) 59.1 (2005), 3–13. 05–56Radwan, Adel Abu (Sultan Qaboos U, Oman; radwan@squ.edu.om ). The effectiveness of explicit attention to form in language learning. System (Oxford, UK) 33.1 (2005), 69–87. 05–57Rieder, Angelika (U of Vienna, Austria). Der Aufbau von Wortbedeutungswissen beim Lesen fremdsprachiger Texte: ausgewählte Fallstudienergebnisse [The development of word comprehension during reading of texts in a foreign language: results from empirical case studies]. Fremdsprachen Lehren und Lernen (Tübingen, Germany) 33 (2004), 52–71. 05–58Rifkin, Benjamin (U of Wisconsin-Madison, USA; brifkin@wisc.edu ). A ceiling effect in traditional classroom foreign language instruction: data from Russian.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.375 | 0.268 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".