Le lambeau interosseux postérieur à pédicule externe
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The posterior interosseous flap with external pedicle is characterized by the inclusion of the quasi-totality of the posterior forearm fascia to the septum of the posterior interosseous vessels, the flap reaching the defect without tunnelization of this pedicle. The coverage of distal defects in the hand without dangerous dissection of the distal part of the interosseous posterior pedicle, the coverage of large skin defects without sacrificing more skin in the donor area by simply grafting this pedicle, and the possibility of secure immediate defatting of this flap are the main advantages of this technique. From February 1997 to March 2001, there were 12 cases of PIO flaps with external pedicle in patients aged 16 to 65 years. This skin coverage involved the first web space in eight cases, the first and second web spaces in two cases, and the dorsal side of the metacarpophalangeal joints in two other cases. These skin defects were due to severe retractile sequellae of thermic and electrical burns, and their sizes varied from 5×7 cm to 6×12 cm. In all cases, the dissection of the posterior interosseous pedicle stopped 2 cm before its anastomosis with the anterior interosseous artery. In three cases of obese patients, immediate defatting was peformed without any complications. All patients benefitted from an orthesis that kept the wrist in extenstion for three weeks to protect the pedicle, which was sectionned at this date. No complications were reported.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".