MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4235019392 · doi:10.22215/etd/2015-10902

Development of Palladium-Catalyzed Decarboxylative Allylation of Electron-Deficient Sulfones: Method Development and Mechanistic Studies

2015· dissertation· en· W4235019392 on OpenAlexaff
M. Vanessa Gill

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicCatalytic C–H Functionalization Methods
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsProtonationChemistryPalladiumTrifluoromethylLigand (biochemistry)HydrideKinetic isotope effectAlleneCatalysisMedicinal chemistryDeuteriumPhotochemistryOrganic chemistryMetalIonAlkyl

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Palladium-catalyzed decarboxylative allylation is a powerful method of carbon-carbon bond construction. This methodology relies on an electronwithdrawing group to promote the reaction. The use of sulfones in decarboxylative allylation has been explored using the trifluoromethylsulfonyl (triflyl) group, as well as the bis(3,5-trifluoromethyl)phenylsulfonyl (BTMP) group. These substrates are highly reactive at room temperature (triflyl) and 50 o C (BTMP sulfones). A detailed mechanistic study using deuterium-labelled substrates was performed to understand the origin of the protonation side-product. It was proposed that a hydride elimination from the 1 allyl on palladium could generate a palladium hydride intermediate along with an allene. Although small amounts of deuterium incorporation were observed in the protonated products, the proposed mechanism could not be the major pathway. Using isotopically labelled ligand, however, all protonation was supressed. This suggests that the origin of the proton is actually from the ligand and that kinetic isotope effects may be responsible for inhibiting the protonation pathway with labelled ligand.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.800
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.054
GPT teacher head0.369
Teacher spread0.314 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicCatalytic C–H Functionalization MethodsFrench-language works237,207