THE EFFECT OF BUILDING QUALITY AND ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS ON COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION IN MEDAN CITY HISTORICAL BUILDINGS
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The potential for cultural tourism in Medan City in historical buildings. Objective 1) for to determine the quality of buildings on community participation in historical buildings in Medan City. 2) knowing the condition of the building's environmental area towards community participation in historical buildings in Medan City. 3) knowing the quality of the building and the condition of the environmental area on community participation in historical buildings in Medan City. The sample was 218 people. The data collection technique was distributed by questionnaires. Data was processed using Statistical Product Service and Solution version 20.0 for windows. Multiple linear regression data analysis techniques with the formula Y = a + b1X1 + b2X2. The result of multiple linear regression test is R2 of 0.637 or 36.3%, that there is an effect of building quality and environmental conditions on community participation in historical buildings in Medan City. With the results of the F test (Simultaneous) obtained Fcount of 35.53 and Ftable of 1.04, thus Fcount 35.53> Ftable 1.04 and it can be concluded that the quality of buildings and environmental conditions on community participation in historic buildings in Medan City have a significant effect.Keywords: Building Quality, Environmental Conditions, and Community Participation
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".