MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4235042744 · doi:10.1017/9781800101029.008

The Slave Trading Lobby and Piracy in West Africa

2021· other· en· W4235042744 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typeother
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicGlobal Maritime and Colonial Histories
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEconomicsBusinessInternational tradeEconomic geographyGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

At Cape Coast Castle on the Gold Coast (modern-day Ghana), the Royal African Company's headquarters in West Africa, the captured crew of Bartholomew Roberts’ were tried for piracy in nineteen separate trials occurring between 29 March and 19 April 1722. Of the 243 men captured, 168 faced trial. Seventy-seven were acquitted by evidence that suggested they had been forced on board while fifty-two were hanged. A further twenty were condemned to seven years’ servitude in the Royal African Company's African mines, seventeen were transferred to Marshalsea prison in London and two were respited for additional consideration. The remaining seventy-five captured men – described only as “black men” – were sold into slavery without trial. Roberts and his crew had committed numerous depredations in the Caribbean, Newfoundland, Brazil and Africa, before being defeated near Cape Lopez – in modern-day Gabon – by Captain Chaloner Ogle and the crew of the Royal Navy warship Swallow . This proved to be the most substantial naval victory over pirates between 1716 and 1726, which was emphasised by the knighthood granted to Ogle who became the first naval captain to receive a title for triumph over pirates. While the defeat of Roberts, who died during the engagement, and the capture of his crew is often related as one of the most significant events in the suppression of piracy in the early eighteenth century, the role of the British slave trading lobby in facilitating this victory is less understood. Although historians have acknowledged that pirates’ impact on slave trading capital prompted their “extermination” in the early eighteenth century, these assertions make it appear that influential merchants lobbied and the government responded with naval support. As has been discussed in the preceding chapters, government responses to mercantile petitions were much more complex than this. With multiple groups vying for the same finite naval resources, the government had to make decisions about where and when the Royal Navy was present in extra-European waters. Before 1719, naval vessels were not assigned to protect British trade in West Africa during peacetime and this only changed as pirates attacked British slaving vessels along the coast. The subsequent lobbying by competing groups of London-based slavers offers a revealing perspective into the mechanisms surrounding mercantile petitioning and its influence on the nature of British naval power in extra-European waters.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.245
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.271
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGlobal Maritime and Colonial HistoriesFrench-language works237,207