Production of cellulases and xylanases by low-temperature basidiomycetes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Three of four isolates, representing phylogenetically distinct groupings of low-temperature basidiomycetes (LTB), were capable of utilizing wheat straw, and to a lesser extent conifer wood at 15°C. A cottony snow mould LTB (LRS 013) and a fruit rot LTB (LRS 241) grown on straw significantly degraded filter paper, carboxymethylcellulose (CMC), p-nitrophenyl β-glucopyranoside (i.e., β-glucosidases), and xylan. Enzymes produced by Coprinus psychromorbidus (LRS 067) were limited to xylanases from straw and wood and β-glucosidases from wood. A sclerotia-forming LTB (LRS 131) exhibited poor growth on both substrates, and did not produce detectable quantities of extracellular enzymes. None of the LTB isolates tested degraded avicel. The temperature optima of CMCases and xylanases in the filtrates from the straw medium ranged from 25°C to 55°C, and with the exception of LRS 067, significant activity was observed at 5°C. Two cellulases (25 and 31 kDa) and two xylanases (24 and 34 kDa) were observed on zymograms for LRS 013 and 241. Reduction of enzymes with 2-mercaptoethanol adversely affected their activity on zymograms, and an additional cellulase band was observed for non-reduced samples. This study indicates that LTB produce an array of cellulolytic and xylanolytic enzymes, and that some of these enzymes possess low-temperature optima which may facilitate degradation of plant fibre under low-temperature conditions.Key words: psychrophile, snow mould, cellulase, xylanase, enzymes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".