Bibliographic record
Abstract
Citation (2013), "Editorial board", From Economy to Society? Perspectives on Transnational Risk Regulation (Studies in Law, Politics, and Society, Vol. 62), Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Bingley, pp. xi-xii. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1059-4337(2013)0000062018 Publisher: Emerald Group Publishing Limited Copyright © 2013 Emerald Group Publishing Limited Gad Barzilai Political Science, University of Washington, USA and Tel Aviv University, Israel Paul Berman Law, George Washington University, USA Roger Cotterrell Legal Theory, Queen Mary College, University of London, UK Jennifer Culbert Political Science, Johns Hopkins University, USA Eve Darian-Smith Global Studies, University of CaliforniaSanta Barbara, USA David Delaney Law, Jurisprudence, and Social Thought Amherst College, USA Florence Dore English, University of North Carolina, USA David Engel Law, State University of New York at Buffalo, USA Anthony Farley Law, Albany Law School, USA David Garland Law, New York University, USA Jonathan Goldberg-Hiller Political Science, University of Hawaii, USA Laura Gomez Law, University of California, Los Angeles, USA Piyel Haldar Law, Birkbeck CollegeUniversity of London, UK Thomas Hilbink Open Society Institute, USA Desmond Manderson Law, McGill University, Canada Jennifer Mnookin Law, U.C.L.A., USA Laura Beth Nielsen Research Fellow, American Bar Foundation, USA Paul Passavant Political Science, Hobart and William Smith College, USA Susan Schmeiser Law, University of Connecticut, USA Jonathan Simon Jurisprudence and Social Policy, University of CaliforniaBerkeley, USA Marianna Valverde Criminology, University of Toronto, Canada Alison Young Criminology, University of Melbourne, Australia Book Chapters From economy to society? perspectives on transnational risk regulation Studies in law, politics, and society From economy to society? Perspectives on transnational risk regulation Copyright page List of contributors Editorial board After a romantic aspiration to society: Harnessing the regulatory capacity of a social sphere Polanyi in an hourglass: The two lives of a sociological classic A systems theory perspective on Polanyi’s great transformation: The case of financial derivative contracts From Polanyi to discourse theory How markets work: The lawyer’s version ☆ W. Mark C. Weidemaier and Mitu Gulati are on the faculties of the University of North Carolina Law School and Duke University Law School, respectively. An earlier version of this article was presented at the conference on Socializing Economic Relationships: New Perspectives and Methods for Transnational Risk Regulation, at the Centre for Socio-Legal Studies at the University of Oxford. We thank Bettina Lange, Dania Thomas, and conference participants for comments on the article. Sovereign debt restructuring in the Eurozone: A polanyian reading of private law enforcement Defiance in the social sphere: The complexity of risk regulation in the case of fair trade “Etiquette and magic”: Between embedding and embedded corporate social responsibility Emotions and risk regulation Trust and regulation: Insights from the mining industry Separate spheres? The cultural contradictions of markets
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.048 | 0.356 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".