MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4235084315 · doi:10.1149/ma2017-01/37/1737

Electrochemical Studies of Zinc/Cysteine Interactions

2017· article· en· W4235084315 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Michelle Y Doan, Matthew A. Worosz, Graham T. Cheek

Bibliographic record

VenueECS Meeting Abstracts · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicCorrosion Behavior and Inhibition
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCysteineChemistryElectrochemistryZincInorganic chemistryRedoxGlassy carbonPotentiostatElectrodeNuclear chemistryBiochemistryOrganic chemistryCyclic voltammetryPhysical chemistryEnzyme

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction The amino acid L-cysteine has been studied because of its role in several biochemical pathways (1). Electrochemical studies are possible due to the redox characteristics of the sulfhydryl group, so that the electrochemical characteristics of L-cysteine can be determined by voltammetric methods (2). In this study, the biochemical importance of zinc(II)/cysteine complexes in proteins (“zinc fingers”) has prompted an investigation of the interaction of ZnSO4with L-cysteine in various media. Experimental L-Cysteine was obtained from Sigma-Aldrich Company, and ZnSO4 .7 H2O was obtained from ThermoFisher Scientific. A Gamry Interface 1000 potentiostat with Gamry Framework software was used to carry out electrochemical experiments. Potentials are referenced against a Ag/AgCl reference electrode. Platinum and glassy carbon electrodes were purchased from BASi. Gold electrodes were obtained from eDAQ. Results and Discussion In a study of the complexation of Zn2+ by L-cysteine in pH 7.4 phosphate buffer, it was found that addition of ZnSO4 . 7 H2O to the buffer solution produced a cloudy appearance due to the low solubility of the resulting Zn3(PO4)2 . Upon addition of L-cysteine, the system was still cloudy at the 1:1 L-cysteine : Zn2+ point; however, at the 2:1 L-cysteine : Zn2+ point, the solution became clear. This behavior evidently occurs because the interaction of Zn2+ with L-cysteine is stronger than is its interaction with phosphate. These results are consistent with Zn(cys)2 complexation reported in the literature (3). The corresponding voltammograms at glassy carbon are shown in Figure 1. For ZnSO4 addition, the scan showed only a very small zinc stripping peak at the negative end of the potential range. At the 1:1 L-cysteine : Zn2+ point, processes are clearly evident for zinc deposition/stripping, and oxidation of complexed L-cysteine is observed at +0.7 V vs Ag/AgCl. This oxidation process is slightly altered compared to that observed for only L-cysteine (no added Zn2+) (2). Similar behavior for the oxidation processes was also observed at gold. Further additions of L-cysteine gave larger currents for the L-cysteine oxidation process. These results support the uptake of zinc ion into the solution as L-cysteine interacts with Zn2+, initially added as ZnSO4 . 7 H2O in pH 7.4 phosphate buffer. References C.K. Mathews, K.E. Van Holde, D.R. Appling, and S. J. Anthony-Cahill, Biochemistry, 4th Edition, Pearson Canada, Toronto, 2013. G. T. Cheek and M. A. Worosz, ECS Transactions, 2016, 72(27), 1-8. S. Foley and M. Enescu, Vibrational Spectroscopy, 2007, 44, 256-265. Figure 1. Cyclic voltammograms at glassy carbon (3 mm diameter) in aqueous pH 7.4 phosphate buffer, 100 mV/s scan rate. [ Dashed red line : ZnSO4 . 7 H2O, 2.1 mM nominal concentration ] [ Solid black line : Addition of 2.4 mM L-cysteine to previous solution ] Figure 1

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.336
Teacher spread0.288 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueECS Meeting AbstractsSame topicCorrosion Behavior and InhibitionFrench-language works237,207