Bibliographic record
Abstract
Previous articleNext article FreeContributorsFull TextPDF Add to favoritesDownload CitationTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints Share onFacebookTwitterLinked InRedditEmailQR Code SectionsMoreRobin Bartram is assistant professor of sociology at Tulane University. Her research examines housing inequality, with a focus on regulations, materiality, race, and gender. She is writing a book about building code enforcement and urban inequality.Lucas G. Drouhot is a postdoctoral research fellow at the Max Planck Institute for the Study of Religious and Ethnic Diversity with substantive interests in international migration, social networks, and social stratification. His current research focuses on the incorporation of children of immigrants in Western Europe and the United States, with an empirical focus on social mobility trajectories, friendship patterns, and acculturation dynamics. He holds a PhD in sociology from Cornell University.Poulami Roychoudhury is assistant professor of sociology at McGill University. Her research examines the relationship between politics, law, and social inequality. Her research has been published in Gender and Society, Law and Social Inquiry, Signs, and Social Problems, and she is the author of Capable Women, Incapable States (Oxford University Press, 2021).Mary Pattillo is the Harold Washington Professor of Sociology and African American Studies and a faculty affiliate at the Institute for Policy Research at Northwestern University.Gabriela Kirk is a PhD candidate in the Department of Sociology at Northwestern University.Florencia Torche is professor in the Department of Sociology at Stanford University. Her scholarship examines inequality dynamics, family processes, and the impact of early life exposures on individual attainment and well-being.Alejandra Abufhele holds a Ph.D. and an M.A. in demography from the University of Pennsylvania as well as an M.A. in public policy and a B.A. in economics from Universidad de Chile. Her research lies in the areas of social demography, family, and early childhood development. She is interested in issues of poverty and inequality across the life cycle. Previous articleNext article DetailsFiguresReferencesCited by American Journal of Sociology Volume 126, Number 4January 2021 Article DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1086/714331 Views: 323 © 2021 by The University of Chicago. All rights reserved. Crossref reports no articles citing this article.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".