Care Beyond Cure: Management of Pain and Other Symptoms
Bibliographic record
Abstract
I n the field of palliative care, perhaps more so than in other areas of health care, the pharmacist needs to be creative, innovative, and oriented to the patient's quality of life.As such, Care Beyond Cure does not pretend to be perfect.We all know that what is right today may be less suitable tomorrow.This resource offers comprehensive guidance, combining evidencebased medicine with a practical, clinical-based approach.Many pharmacists have demonstrated commitment and dedication to the field of palliative care and to keeping up with the continual changes in this domain.This guide serves as an update on issues in the field, offers current approaches to care, and focuses on cutting-edge and evolving topics.It also exposes some controversies and debates about treatments that are not yet well established.The authors do not expect miracles but rather offer their best recommendations for providing innovative care without causing harm to the patient.As pharmacists, we constantly adjust the balance between our own clinical experience and evidence-based medicine.Do no harm, act in an ethical way, stay calm and professional in the midst of controversy, and do the best you can for the person who is asking for help: this is our way of thinking.Pharmacists play an important role in providing appropriate information to patients, their families and friends, and health care professionals.As such, they may influence choices, myths, fears, beliefs, and attitudes.This book seeks to refresh the cycle of knowledge in the management of pain and other symptoms.The authors understand the need to update pharmacological knowledge and acquire skills in clinical management, and also to ensure that those skills are transferred to others in day-to-day practice.In a fundamental way, we want to give clues to overcoming the barriers to effective pain management.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".