MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4235362907 · doi:10.1002/3527602348.ch2b

Potential Source of Energy and Chemical Products: Sections 5–8

2000· other· en· W4235362907 on OpenAlexaff
Naim Kosaric, Fazilet Vardar‐Sukan

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typeother
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicBiofuel production and bioconversion
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStillageFermentationChemistryEthanol fuelEthanolEthanol fermentationHydrolysisBiofuelPulp and paper industryEnzymatic hydrolysisSulfuric acidWaste managementFood scienceBiochemistryOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This chapter contains sections titled: Fermentation Modes of Industrial Interest Batch Process Fed-Batch Processes Semi-Continuous Processes Continuous Processes Industrial Processes Types of Bioreactors for Ethanol Production Solid Phase Fermentation (Ex-Ferm Process) Simultaneous Saccharification and Fermentation (SSF) Process Recycle Systems Novel Reactors for On-Line Product Removal Some Examples of Industrial Processes Ethanol from Corn Ethanol from Cassava Root Ethanol from Potatoes Ethanol from Jerusalem Artichoke Tubers (Topinambur) Ethanol from Carob Pod Extract Ethanol from Cellulose Dilute Sulfuric Acid Process Strong Acid Hydrolysis Process Ethanol Production from Agricultural Residues via Acid Hydrolysis Ethanol from Newspaper via Enzymatic Hydrolysis Ethanol from Municipal Solid Waste via Acid Hydrolysis Ethanol from Waste Sulfite Liquor (WSL) Ethanol from Whey By-Products of Ethanol Fermentation Waste Biomass Stillage Carbon Dioxide Fusel Oils Economic and Energy Aspects of Ethanol Fermentation Ethanol from Jerusalem Artichokes (A Case Study) Energetics Ethanol from Corn Ethanol from Sugarcane and Cassava Ethanol from Wood Ethanol from Cornstalks

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.169
Threshold uncertainty score0.564

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1690.071

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.161
Teacher spread0.157 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicBiofuel production and bioconversion→French-language works237,207→