MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4235370097 · doi:10.1513/pats.200906-040al

Blastomycosis

2010· review· en· W4235370097 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Jeannina A. Smith, Carol A. Kauffman

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the American Thoracic Society · 2010
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicFungal Infections and Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBlastomycosisMedicineHistoplasmosisBlastomycesAsymptomaticARDSImmunologyDermatologyIntensive care medicinePathologyLungInternal medicineBlastomyces dermatitidis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Blastomycosis is an endemic mycosis that occurs predominantly in North America in the north central United States and provinces of Canada, southern states, and those midwestern states that border the Mississippi River basin. It causes acute and chronic pneumonias and disseminated infection with cutaneous lesions as the major extrapulmonary manifestation. However, the vast majority of infected persons are asymptomatic or have mild respiratory symptoms that are not diagnosed as being caused by a fungal infection. Rarely, patients develop severe pulmonary infection that progresses to acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), which has a high mortality rate. A urinary antigen test is now available to aid in diagnosis, but it is not specific and is positive in patients who have histoplasmosis as well as blastomycosis. Antibody assays remain nonspecific and insensitive, and the confirmatory diagnostic test is still growth of the organism in culture. Updated guidelines from the Infectious Diseases Society of America are available to aid clinicians in the management of the various forms of blastomycosis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.030

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.051
GPT teacher head0.391
Teacher spread0.339 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations97
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of the American Thoracic SocietySame topicFungal Infections and StudiesFrench-language works237,207