MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4235512661 · doi:10.1163/24685542-12340051

Research Abstracts

2020· article· en· W4235512661 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Islamic Ethics · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicIslamic Studies and History
Canadian institutionsUniversity of LethbridgeCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRelation (database)IntellectPhilosophyCharacter (mathematics)Reading (process)TheologySection (typography)EpistemologyPsychologyLinguisticsMathematicsComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper investigates the Sufi concept of futuwwa (spiritual chivalry) in Abdallh al-Anr al-Haraw's (d. 481/1089) classic manual of spiritual wayfaring Manzil al-Sirn ("Stations of the Wayfarers"). After briefly taking stock of the earliest statements on futuwwa cited in al-Qushayr's (d. 465/1073) Risla, we take a closer look at the Manzil's commentarial tradition, offering a complete translation of both al-Anr's chapter on the subject and Abd al-Razzq al-Kshn's (d. 731/1330) commentary. In al-Anr's view, there are three aspects to futuwwa. The first aspect is in relation to oneself, the second is in relation to others, and the third is in relation to God. Futuwwa in relation to oneself is to accept trials and tribulations in stride. With respect to others, it is to hold oneself but not others accountable, seeing outward injuries as inward blessings. With respect to one's relation to God, it is to abandon means and ends, relying on God alone through the heart's reception, not the intellect's endeavor. The discussion section offers an ontological-ethical investigation through a close reading of the text and its commentary, then offers a broader perspective on futuwwa, which is tantamount to the noblest character traits (makrim al-akhlq). In the final analysis, futuwwa symbolises the quality of the spiritual warrior who conquers his lower self to attain the makrim al-akhlq.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.008
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesResearch integrity
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.872
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0080.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.279
GPT teacher head0.464
Teacher spread0.184 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Islamic EthicsSame topicIslamic Studies and HistoryFrench-language works237,207