MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4235529256 · doi:10.1017/cjn.2019.153

P.053 Whole-genome sequencing identified a frameshift mutation at LMNB1 in a family with early-onset dystonia

2019· article· en· W4235529256 on OpenAlexaffvenue
RK Yuen, Bahareh AdhamiMojarad, Ian Backstrom, A Yin, T Soman

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Neurological Sciences / Journal Canadien des Sciences Neurologiques · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGenomics and Rare Diseases
Canadian institutionsSystems, Applications & Products in Data Processing (Canada)Toronto Public Health
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDystoniaFrameshift mutationProbandGeneticsMicrocephalyMutationGenetic counselingMedicineBiologyGenePsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Dystonia is a hyperkinetic condition that produces abnormal movements or postures. Its diagnostic procedure is often challenging and time consuming. Genetic testing provides an effective approach for diagnosis, but currently only very few dystonia genes have been identified. We propose that studying early-onset forms of dystonia with the use of whole-genome sequencing (WGS) will improve the identification of dystonia-relevant genes and mutations. Methods: We performed deep WGS using the Illumina HiSeq X technology in a mother-proband pair with dystonia. The mother has generalized dystonia (age of onset: 15) and the proband has myoclonic dystonia (age of onset: 11). Results: No pathogenic mutation was identified in any of the known dystonia genes. However, we identified a rare heterozygous frameshift mutation (p.K342fs*7) at LMNB1 that was shared between the mother and the proband. Duplication of LMNB1 is known to cause Adult-onset Demyelinating Leukodystrophy. A heterozygous deletion of LMNB1 has been reported in a patient with microcephaly and global developmental disorder. Conclusions: Further characterization of phenotypes in the participants and their family members is needed to confirm the relationship between mutation in LMNB1 and dystonia. This work provides a proof-of-principle that novel disease-relevant genes can potentially be identified using the proposed approach.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.047
Threshold uncertainty score0.094

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Neurological Sciences / Journal Canadien des Sciences Neurologiques→Same topicGenomics and Rare Diseases→French-language works237,207→