EL RÉGIMEN LINGÜÍSTICO DE LA PROVINCIA CANADIENSE DE NUEVO BRUNSWICK
Bibliographic record
Abstract
En Canadá rige un modelo de federalismo lingüístico. Este modelo se caracteriza, entre otras notas, por una estrecha vinculación entre régimen lingüístico y estructura federal del Estado. Las lenguas mayoritarias tienen consideración de idiomas estatales y, al mismo tiempo, cada entidad federada puede configurar su propia política lingüística. Este artículo analiza el régimen lingüístico de una provincia canadiense que goza de un estatuto un tanto particular: Nuevo Brunswick. Es la única provincia que garantiza un régimen de cooficialidad lingüística en el que ambos idiomas oficiales, francés e inglés, gozan de las mismas garantías constitucionales. Dichas garantías se fundamentan sobre el principio constitucional de igualdad de los dos idiomas oficiales y el principio de igualdad de ambas comunidades lingüísticas. Se trata de un marco normativo único en el escenario provincial canadiense que constituye el resultado de una larga evolución histórica, condicionada por múltiples factores sociales y políticos, tanto puntuales como contínuos. Kanadan hizkuntzaren federalismoa da indarrean dagoen eredua. Eredu horren ezaugarrietako bat da lotura handia dagoela hizkuntza-erregimenaren eta estatuaren egitura federalaren artean. Gehiengoarenak diren hizkuntzak estatuaren hizkuntzatzat hartzen dira, eta aldi berean, federazioko erakunde bakoitzak bere hizkuntza-politika zehatza bidera dezake, lurraldetasunaren irizpidea oinarri hartuta, baina pertsonalitatearen printzipioak zertxobait mugatuta. Artikuluan Kanadan estatutu nahiko berezia duen probintzia bateko hizkuntza-erregimena aztertu da: Brunswick Berriko egoera, hain juxtu. Probintzia horretan, hizkuntzen koofizialtasuna bermatuta dago, eta ondorioz, bi hizkuntza ofizialek, frantsesak eta ingelesak, berme konstituzional berak dituzte. Berme horiek Kanadako konstituzioan jasotzen diren bi printzipiotan dute oinarria: bi hizkuntza ofizialen berdintasuna aldarrikatzen duen printzipioa, eta bi hizkuntza-komunitateen berdintasunaren printzipioa aldarrikatzen duena. Kanadako probintziez ari garela, parekorik gabeko arau-esparrua da hori, eta bilakaera historiko luze baten ondorioa da gainera, hainbat eragile sozial eta politikok baldintzatua, bai aldian aldikoek, bai iraunkorragoak direnek A model of linguistic federalism rules on Canada. The main feature of this model is among other things its close relationship between the linguistic regime and the State¿s federal structure. The majoritarian languages are considered State languages and at the same time each entity part of the Federation can establish its own linguistic policy in conformity with the territoriality criteria clarified by some features of the principle of personality. This article analizes the linguistic regime of a Canadian province which enjoys a sort of specific status: New Brunswick. This is the only province that assures a co-officiality regime where both languages, French and English, enjoy same constitutional guarantees. Those guarantees are based on the constitutional principle of equality among official languages and on the principle of equality for both linguistic communities. It is a unique legal frame within the Canadian provincial scenario that constitutes the result of a long historical evolution conditionated by multiple social and political factors, both punctual and constant.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".