Bibliographic record
Abstract
Citation (2015), "List of Contributors", Contributions from European Symbolic Interactionists: Reflections on Methods (Studies in Symbolic Interaction, Vol. 44), Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Bingley, p. vii. https://doi.org/10.1108/S0163-239620150000044015 Publisher: Emerald Group Publishing Limited Copyright © 2015 Emerald Group Publishing Limited J. I. (Hans) Bakker University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada; Brandon University, Brandon, Manitoba Danielle Chevalier University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands Caroline De Man Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB) Brussels, Brussels, Belgium Christine Leuenberger Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA Philip Lewin Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, FL, USA Thaddeus Müller Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands; Lancaster University, Lancaster, United Kingdom Roel Pieterman Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands Diana van Dijk Independent Researcher, Rotterdam, The Netherlands Book Chapters Contributions from European Symbolic Interactionists: Reflections on Methods Studies in Symbolic Interaction Contributions from European Symbolic Interactionists: Reflections on Methods Copyright Page List of Contributors Series Editor’s Introduction Volume Editor’s Introduction: The Diversity of Symbolic Interaction in Europe ‘You Are Not from Around Here, Are You’: Getting Othered in Participant Observation Knowledge-Making and its Politics in Conflict Regions: Doing Research in Israel/Palestine An Observation Situation: When the Researcher’s Scenes Interact Mission Impossible: Not Getting Emotionally Involved in Research among Vulnerable Youth in South Africa Deeper Play: Geertz’s “Thick Description” and a Balinese Temple Ritual (the Odalan) Obesity as Disease and Deviance: Risk and Morality in Early 21st Century Moral Entrepreneurship Revisited: Police Officers Monitoring Cannabis Retailers in Rotterdam, the Netherlands New Empirical Studies Embodying the Postmodern Self: Ecstatic Ritual as a New Mode of Youth Identity Work About the Authors
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.021 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".