Bibliographic record
Abstract
canadienne-de-science-politique) until after a manuscript is accepted for publication. La Revue utilise un processus d'examen double insu comportant au moins deux valuations pour chaque soumission. Toutes les soumissions la Revue sont traites via le systme de suivi en ligne Editorial Manager l'adresse https://www.editorialmanager.com/cjps-rcsp/. Les articles de recherche ne doivent pas dpasser 10 000 mots (tout matriel inclus), quant aux notes de recherches elles ne doivent pas excder les 6 000 mots; les soumissions doivent tre prpares en MS Word, double interligne et dans une police de caractres d'au moins 12 points. Les rsums doivent avoir une longueur de 150 mots. Les auteurs(es) peuvent inclure des lments qui compltent leur manuscrit (tels que des tableaux, des fi gures, des annexes ou encore des questionnaires d'entrevue) qui ne seront disponibles que sous forme d'annexe en ligne. Les recensions doivent avoir une longueur maximale de 800 mots et soumis directement l'diteur par courriel ; veuillez noter que la Revue n'accepte pas les recensions non sollicites. La Revue n'exige pas que les soumissions initiales soient mises
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.400 | 0.656 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".