The impact of imperialism : the general elections of 1895 and 1900
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Electoral politics, 1895–1900 In June 1895 Lord Rosebery was forced to resign after losing a Commons vote over the supply of cordite to the army, and Lord Salisbury, on taking over, immediately called a general election. The outgoing Liberal ministry had passed few measures of real significance, with the exception of the Parish Councils Act in 1894, and the introduction of death duties in Harcourt's budget of the same year. The party was still reeling from Gladstone's final retirement in 1894, and Rosebery had little to show to the electorate other than to re-present the Newcastle Programme, and blame the House of Lords for obstructing its implementation.The election represented the party's Victorian nadir, and they left 132 seats uncontested. On the opposite side, the Conservatives and the Liberal Unionists had moved closer together, and it was not a surprise that they gained ninety-eight seats and won a crushing Commons majority of 152. East Anglia closely followed the national picture. The swing to Unionism from the previous election was just 1 per cent, but this yielded impressive gains. The retirement of J. J. Colman at Norwich allowed the local brewer Harry Bullard (who had served a seven-year ban following his unseating on a petition in 1885) to return as the city's junior member, and John Colomb gained Yarmouth. The Liberals wrested a seat back at Ipswich, but the successful candidate, Daniel Ford Goddard, was now their only East Anglian borough member. In the counties, the picture was unchanged in Norfolk, with the Liberals holding four out of six constituencies (albeit with small majorities in the Mid, East and Northern divisions), but in Suffolk they lost Stowmarket and Woodbridge to Ian Malcolm and Captain E. J. Pretyman respectively. They also left two difficult seats (Bury St Edmunds and Sudbury) uncontested: just the second time that they had failed to field a candidate for an East Anglian division since 1880. The campaign itself was not dominated by a single major issue, but the corpus suggests that the House of Lords, Local Veto and social reform were emphasised most widely, while the discursive significance of Home Rule declined markedly.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.008 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.012 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".