MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4235977129 · doi:10.1145/941322.941323

Alert aggregation in mobile ad hoc networks

2003· article· en· W4235977129 on OpenAlexaff
Bo Sun, Kui Wu, Udo W. Pooch

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicMobile Ad Hoc Networks
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceIntrusion detection systemComputer networkMobile ad hoc networkRouting protocolWireless ad hoc networkDefault gatewayInteroperabilityRouting (electronic design automation)Vehicular ad hoc networkDistributed computingData miningNetwork packetWireless

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In Intrusion Detection Systems (IDSs) for Mobile Ad hoc NETworks (MANETs), IDS agents using local detection engines alone may lead to undesirable performance due to the dynamic feature of MANETs. In this paper, we present a nonoverlapping Zone-based Intrusion Detection System (ZBIDS) for MANETs. Focusing on the protection of MANET routing protocols, we propose the collaboration mechanism of ZBIDS agents and an aggregation algorithm used by ZBIDS gateway nodes. The aggregation algorithm mainly utilizes the probability distribution of the $Source$ attribute in order to make the final decisions to generate alarms. We demonstrate that, by integrating the security related information from a wider area, the aggregation algorithm can reduce the false alarm ratio and improve the detection ratio. Also, the gateway nodes in ZBIDS can provide more diagnostic information by presenting a global view of attacks. We also present an alert data model conformed to Intrusion Detection Message Exchange Format (IDMEF) to facilitate the interoperability of IDS agents. Based on the routing disruption attack aimed at the Dynamic Source Routing protocol (DSR), we study the performance of ZBIDS at different mobility levels. Simulation results show that our system can achieve lower false positive ratio and higher detection ratio, compared to systems with local detection only.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.934
Threshold uncertainty score0.454

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations18
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMobile Ad Hoc NetworksFrench-language works237,207