Le pays méditerranéen en profondeur
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Les études proposées dans cet ouvrage sont parties de la proposition qu’une bonne partie de ce qui donne vie à la Méditerranée, qu’il s’agisse d’un monde réel ou d’un monde imaginé, vient des chemins qui y mènent. En effet, le regard porté sur cette région tant étudiée se renouvelle si on l’inverse, et si l’on part non pas d’une mer intérieure mais des terres intérieures, d’un arrière-pays, de ces marges floues qui la caractérisent sans jamais la délimiter. Les auteurs de ce livre, qui réunit chercheurs canadiens, britanniques, irlandais, grecs, chypriotes, allemands et français, ont tracé le parcours de ceux qui ont voyagé vers et depuis la Méditerranée. Le croisement des différentes lectures critiques et la diversité des objets de recherche posent la question de la conceptualisation du lieu et affirment la nécessité de réinventer une géographie humaine et mythique, un lieu commun d’échange et de partage. L’ouvrage s’adresse à un large public, tout autant qu’à un public universitaire soucieux de comprendre les enjeux historiques, culturels et esthétiques du monde méditerranéen à travers l’histoire et la littérature des penseurs et écrivains de langue anglaise et française qui se sont un jour tournés vers la Méditerranée. The point of departure of these selected studies was the proposition that much of what brings the Mediterranean world to life, whether that world be imaginary or real, comes from the paths that lead to it. In other words, our understanding of this much-studied region is altered if we start out, not from an inland sea, but from the lands surrounding that sea, from the hinterlands, from the blurred margins which both distinguish and soften its contours. The authors in this collection, which brings together academics from Canada, the United Kingdom, Ireland, Greece, Cyprus, Germany and France, have traced the itineraries of those who have travelled towards and away from the Mediterranean. The variety of critical readings and the diversity of the documents studied raise questions about how a given space is conceptualized, and affirm the need for a geography that is both human and mythical, one which accounts for how people cohabit in a shared cultural space. The work should interest both the general public and an academic audience keen to understand the historical, cultural and aesthetic values of the Mediterranean world, through the history and literature of those writers who, once upon a time, set out in search of the Mediterranean.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.016 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".