MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4236088517 · doi:10.21203/rs.2.10026/v1

Association analysis and in-vitro anti-fungal assay reveal a role for the Pinus monticola PR10 gene (PmPR10-3.1) in quantitative resistance to white pine blister rust

2019· preprint· en· W4236088517 on OpenAlexaff
Jun‐Jun Liu, Humberto Fernandes, Arezoo Zamany, M. Sikorski, Mariusz Jaskólski, Richard A. Sniezko

Bibliographic record

VenueResearch Square · 2019
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicYeasts and Rust Fungi Studies
Canadian institutionsCanadian Forest Service
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRust (programming language)BotanyBiologyInonotus obliquusPinus <genus>In vitroResistance (ecology)LichenWhite (mutation)GeneGeneticsEcologyBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Pathogenesis-related (PR) proteins play important roles in plant defense response. However, functional investigation of PR10 genes is still limited and their physiological roles have not been conclusively characterized in biological processes of forest conifer trees. Results To elucidate the biological roles of PR proteins of class 10 (PR10) in tree resistance to pathogens, in the present study we identified multiple novel members in the complex PmPR10 family of western white pine (Pinus monticola Douglas ex D. Don). Phylogenetic analysis revealed that PmPR10 genes were grouped into clusters and sub-clusters, showing a relatively high synteny between the same cluster/sub-cluster across different species of five-needle pines. RNA-seq-based global gene expression study demonstrated the PmPR10 genes were differentially expressed in response to infection by Cronartium ribicola, an exotic fungus causing white pine blister rust (WPBR) across North America. Among all family members, PmPR10-3.1 transcripts were significantly up-regulate at both early and late stages post rust infection. This gene was further revealed to have significant contribution to host quantitative resistance to WPBR by an association study. Moreover, PmPR10-3.1 recombinant protein exhibited inhibitory effects on spore hyphal growth of fungal pathogens C. ribicola, Phoma exigua and P. argillacea by in-vitro antifungal analysis. Conclusion Our results suggest that PmPR10-3.1 may function as an important component in conifer basal immunity for non-specific resistance to a wide spectrum of pathogens.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.174
Threshold uncertainty score0.824

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.346
Teacher spread0.321 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueResearch SquareSame topicYeasts and Rust Fungi StudiesFrench-language works237,207