MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Donatello

2020· reference-entry· en· W4236092404 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Amy R. Bloch

Bibliographic record

VenueRenaissance and Reformation · 2020
Typereference-entry
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicRenaissance and Early Modern Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSculptureArtPulpitGeorge (robot)BronzeArt historyFifteenthAltarpieceAncient historyHumanitiesClassicsPaintingVisual artsHistory

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Donatello, born Donato di Niccolò di Betto di Bardo (b. c. 1386–d. 1466) in Florence, was one of the most gifted and versatile sculptors working on the Italian peninsula during the Quattrocento. Reflecting his career, the scholarship on Donatello is vast and varied, and nearly all aspects of his life and works have received sustained attention. Though he trained in bronze casting and, apparently, in goldsmithery, his first documented works were in marble. From c. 1406 to 1440 he carved marble sculptures for Florence Cathedral and its Campanile. During the first three decades of the fifteenth century he fashioned statues for the exterior of the Florentine guild church of Orsanmichele (Sts. Mark, George, and Louis of Toulouse), as well as a variety of sculptures elsewhere. In the 1420s and 1430s he worked in Siena, carrying out a relief and statues for the font of the Baptistery and a tomb slab for Giovanni Pecci (Cathedral). Alongside Michelozzo, with whom he maintained a legal partnership (c. 1425–1434), he completed in the 1420s other tombs—one for Baldassare Cossa (the antipope John XXIII) in the Florence Baptistery and another for Rainaldo Brancacci in Sant’Angelo a Nilo in Naples—and, in the 1430s, a pulpit for Prato Cathedral. He spent two years in Rome—1432–1433—and made a number of sculptures there; he also worked for patrons in Mantua, Ferrara, and Modena. Though inspired by ancient and medieval art, Donatello was a relentlessly innovative sculptor whose approach was often experimental. He invented the schiacciato relief, demonstrating painterly effects in sculpture; he participated in the reinvention of the bronze statuette; and he was one of the first to fashion, after Antiquity, life-sized, freestanding statues. Examples include his extensively studied bronze David and Judith and Holofernes, both of which, along with relief sculptures at the church of San Lorenzo, he made for the Medici family, his enthusiastic patrons. From c. 1443 to 1453 he resided in Padua, where he made sculptures for the interior of the Basilica of Sant’Antonio, as well as the equestrian portrait of Gattamelata. He worked in Siena from 1457 to 1459 before returning to Florence, where he died. He utilized a wide range of media: stone of all types, metal (gilded and ungilded bronze), glass, fiber, wax, ceramic, polychromed wood (e.g., the St. John the Baptist in Venice; his haunting Mary Magdelene), terracotta, and stucco—the latter two used to craft inventive reliefs of the Virgin and Christ Child. He was especially attentive to the treatment of surface and often painted, carved, or scratched materials so they resembled other substances. Near-contemporary sources describe him as sarcastic, witty, and clever.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.599
Threshold uncertainty score0.000

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0080.003
Open science0.0020.004
Research integrity0.0030.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.5990.410

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.048
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.192 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRenaissance and ReformationSame topicRenaissance and Early Modern StudiesFrench-language works237,207