MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4236092838 · doi:10.4095/297784

HALIP volcanic-intrusive complexes, Axel Heiberg Island, Nunavut

2016· report· en· W4236092838 on OpenAlexaffabout
M -C Williamson, B -M Saumur, C A Evenchick

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typereport
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological Studies and Exploration
Canadian institutionsNatural Resources Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVolcanoGeochemistryGeologyEarth science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Fieldwork in the summer of 2015 was carried out at various localities in the southern half of Axel Heiberg Island, and focused on volcanic successsions and sub-volcanic intrusive complexes of the High Arctic Large Igneous Province (HALIP). The ~ 950 m thick sequence of basalts of the Strand Fiord Formation occurring east of Plateau Lake represents a world-class exposure of continental flood basalts consisting of thick units of basalt flows that display well-developed colonnades and entablatures. The intrusive complex at Middle Fiord exhibits intrusions with complex geometries, cross-cutting relationships and lithological variability rarely exposed in Large Igneous Provinces (LIPs) of Mesozoic age. Highlights of fieldwork also include field observations and sampling of the Surprise Fiord dyke swarm and the documentation of showings of massive sulphide mineralization in the Expedition Fiord area. Follow-up mapping, geochemistry, mineralogy and U-Pb geochronology will fill critical knowledge gaps on the magmatic history and Ni-Cu-PGE prospectivity of the Canadian portion of the HALIP. Intrusive complexes in the Middle Fiord area, in particular, will provide a unique opportunity to elucidate the architecture and chemical variability of rarely-exposed volcanic feeder systems associated with LIPs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.689
Threshold uncertainty score0.995

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0600.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGeological Studies and ExplorationFrench-language works237,207