Bibliographic record
Abstract
Contents / Sommaire Vol 36 / No 1 SPRING / PRINTEMPS 2015 1 Marlis Schweitzer Introduction: Pushing the Limits Introduction: repousser les limites ARTICLES 7 Jennifer Wise and Lauren JerkeLiz Gorrie and the Kaleidoscope Alternative 33 Brian Batchelor“This Beer Festival Has a TheatreProblem!”: The Evolution and Rebranding of the Edmonton International Fringe Theatre Festival 52 Natalie DoonanTechniques of Making Public: The Sensorium Through Eating and Walking 73 Naila Keleta-MaeAn Autoethnographic Reading of Djanet Sears’s The Adventures of a Black Girl in Search of God 89 Helene VostersDiamanda Galás and Amanda Todd: Performing Trauma’s Sticky Connections106 Núria Casado GualAmbivalent Pathways of Progress and Decline: The Representation of Aging and Old Age in Joanna McClelland Glass’s DramaFORUM124 Adriana Disman LINK & PIN performance art series126 Kelsy VivashThea Fitz-James: Gendered Boundaries, Durational Performance, and the Art of Holding It In 131 Niomi Anna CherneyPerception is Participation137 T. Nikki Cesare Schotzko“I Haven’t Got Time for the Pain”: The State and Stakes of Performance Art 2.0145 Adriana DismanTowards Anti-Disciplinarity: the (messy) hermeneutics of self-violent performance art156 Steven BushGeorge Luscombe Directing Chicago ’70 at Toronto Workshop Productions: an insider’s subjective account iTRIC / RTAC BOOK REVIEWS/ COMPTES RENDUS165 Melissa PollLudovic Fouquet, The Visual Laboratory of Robert Lepage. Trans. Rhonda Mullins.169 Spy Dénommé-WelchJean O’Hara, ed., Two-Spirit Acts: Queer Indigenous Performances. 171 Peter KulingJennifer Drouin, Shakespeare in Québec: Nation, Gender, and Adaptation.174 CONTRIBUTORS/ COLLABORATEURS178 Guidelines for Submissions/ Avis aux correspondants 180 Submission Response Schedule/ Calendrier des interventionsCover / Couverture: Alison Sealy Smith as Rainey in Djanet Sears’s The Adventures of a Black Girl in Search of God.Photo by Cylla Von Tiedemann. Courtesy of Djanet Sears.ii
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.925 | 0.899 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; the direct Gemma label and the distilled Codex classifier agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".