MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4236215145 · doi:10.1139/z00-139

Mechanism for maintaining oxygen consumption under varying oxygenation levels in the freshwater clam<i>Corbicula fluminea</i>

2000· article· en· W4236215145 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Damien Tran, Alain Boudou, Jean‐Charles Massabuau

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Zoology · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAquatic Invertebrate Ecology and Behavior
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiologyAcclimatizationCorbicula flumineaOxygenContext (archaeology)OxygenationAnimal scienceEcologyRespirationVenous bloodVentilation (architecture)Respiratory systemAnatomyEndocrinologyChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The basic adaptation mechanisms that allow the Asian freshwater clam Corbicula fluminea to maintain its oxygen (O2) consumption constant under resting conditions when the partial pressure of O2([Formula: see text]) in the water varies from 4 to 40 kPa were studied at plankton concentrations which were high enough that ventilation was not affected. Steady-state values for O2consumption, [Formula: see text], and O2concentration in the arterial and venous blood, [Formula: see text] in the expired water, and ventilatory and circulatory blood flow were determined after 24-h periods of exposure to selected water [Formula: see text] values. The key adaptation after 1 day of acclimation was the maintenance of O2consumption, which was achieved exclusively by ventilatory adjustment, with no change in the oxygenation status of the internal milieu. Specifically, arterial [Formula: see text] remained constant at 3 kPa and venous [Formula: see text] at 2 kPa. Arterial and venous blood O2concentrations and blood-flow rate also remained constant. The data are discussed in terms of feeding versus respiratory control of ventilation in filter-feeders in an environmental context. The agreement between the homeostasis strategy described here and previous results reported for the freshwater mussel Anodonta cygnea, crustaceans, and teleosts is emphasised.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations19
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of ZoologySame topicAquatic Invertebrate Ecology and BehaviorFrench-language works237,207