Bibliographic record
Abstract
IEEE Microwave and Wireless Components Letters (MWCL) has been receiving on average 100 papers per month since the beginning of 2013 and the average time from submission to first decision is around ten weeks. For the fourth quarter of 2012 the average time from submission to online posting for accepted papers was around nineteen weeks. These results would not have been accomplished without the tireless and priceless efforts of our volunteers, the Associate Editors, and the reviewers. These volunteers are the cornerstone of a successful and high quality scientific journal. It is with great sadness that I announce the retirement of two Associate Editors: Dr. Dominique Schreurs, Katholieke University Leuven, Belgium, and Dr. Luca Perregrini, University of Pavia, Italy. Dr. Schreurs has accepted the position of Editor-in-Chief for the IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MICROWAVE THEORY AND TECHNIQUES (T-MTT). Dr. Perregrini has accepted the position of Associate Editor for T-MTT under the leadership of Dr. Schreurs. I would also like to thank both of them for their unprecedented services and hard work for MWCL. They will be greatly missed. The successful operation of MWCL cannot continue without Associate Editors. I am pleased to announce the appointment of two new Associate Editors: Dr.Maurizio Bozzi, University of Pavia, Italy, and Dr. Kamal Samanta, Milmega, Ryde, UK. They have already provided their services to MWCL for the last couple of months and I am grateful that they have accepted the invitation to serve our journal. More information regarding the two new Associate Editors is provided in their biographies.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.028 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.005 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.200 | 0.131 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".