MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Introduction and Activation Strategies for Smart Training of Corporate

2018· article· en· W4236408845 on OpenAlexaff
Jieun Lee, Sukjin Kwon, Hyojung Jung

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Industrial Distribution & Business · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicEducational Systems and Policies
Canadian institutionsEducation and Early Childhood Development
FundersMinistry of Employment and Labor
KeywordsTraining (meteorology)QuestionnairePlan (archaeology)Computer scienceMedical educationBusinessApplied psychologyPsychologyMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Purpose -The purpose of this study is to explore the introduction and activation of smart training for the effective training of vocational ability development of companies in the 4th industrial revolution era, we analyze the present status of smart training introduction and related difficulties and propose concrete activation plan.Research design, data, and methodology -Through the online survey, we tried to confirm the recognition of corporate about smart training.Questionnaires include what are the benefits, expectations, and difficulties of smart training, etc.The survey was conducted from August 21, 2017 to September 4, 2017.A total of 69 companies participated in the questionnaire.The questionnaire results were analyzed through frequency analysis and contents analysis.Based on the results of the questionnaire, we found out the cause of inhibition of smart training activation and suggested activation strategies.Results -The main reason for the provision of smart training is the expectation of the training performance and the recognition that it is possible to provide training in a flexible manner.The effectiveness of smart training operation was evaluated as a high level of contribution to the development of creative training course and the capacity of training institute.As a result of checking factors that hinders the activation of smart training, the most important reason is that the time and cost burden of the training institutes is excessive.The lack of expertise in the design of smart training courses and the burden of employers and trainees.Conclusions -In order to activate smart training, it is necessary to find solutions to the obstacles at the internal or external level of training institutions.The internal barriers to the training organization are lack of internal competence for preparation and course management.In this regard, we need to consider providing consulting, best practices or guidance in the process of designing and operating smart training.On the other hand, as an external obstacle factor, it is necessary to provide incentives to participate in smart training.In addition, further research is needed on strategies that can lead to participation in smart training from the viewpoint of employers and learners.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.031

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.109
GPT teacher head0.294
Teacher spread0.185 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Industrial Distribution & BusinessSame topicEducational Systems and PoliciesFrench-language works237,207